From: kensanya <kensanya@163.com>
To: "Leon Romanovsky" <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: bvanassche@acm.org, jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
TanZheng <tanzheng@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re:Re: Re: [PATCH v2] RDMA/srpt: fix NULL deref when sending BUSY before target_init_cmd()
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 14:39:08 +0800 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <71e36b0d.4e93.19fa24c787d.Coremail.kensanya@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260726075511.GC12003@unreal>
At 2026-07-26 15:55:11, "Leon Romanovsky" <leon@kernel.org> wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 10:42:53AM +0800, kensanya wrote:
>> At 2026-07-23 17:51:20, "Leon Romanovsky" <leon@kernel.org> wrote:
>> >On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 10:44:56AM +0800, kensanya@163.com wrote:
>> >> From: TanZheng <tanzheng@kylinos.cn>
>> >>
>> >> If srpt_get_desc_tbl() fails, srpt_handle_cmd() jumps to
>> >> target_send_busy() before target_init_cmd() has set cmd->se_tfo.
>> >> target_send_busy() then dereferences a NULL se_tfo.
>> >>
>> >> Call target_init_cmd() first with placeholder data_length and
>> >> data_direction, parse the descriptor table next, then fill in the
>> >> real data_length. That way target_send_busy() is safe if parsing
>> >> fails.
>> >>
>> >> target_send_busy() is only valid after a successful target_init_cmd().
>> >> If target_init_cmd() itself fails, free the send ioctx tag locally
>> >> with target_free_tag() instead of calling target_send_busy().
>> >>
>> >> Fixes: 8b8807b9e982 ("scsi: RDMA/srpt: Fix handling of command / TMF submission failure")
>> >> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260717025402.64054-1-kensanya@163.com/
>> >> Suggested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
>> >> Signed-off-by: TanZheng <tanzheng@kylinos.cn>
>> >> ---
>> >> v2:
>> >> - On target_init_cmd() failure, use target_free_tag() instead of
>> >> target_send_busy()
>> >>
>> >> drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++--------
>> >> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c
>> >> index f66cfd70c263..71af1fb0d380 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c
>> >> @@ -1558,8 +1558,8 @@ static void srpt_handle_cmd(struct srpt_rdma_ch *ch,
>> >> struct srp_cmd *srp_cmd;
>> >> struct scatterlist *sg = NULL;
>> >> unsigned sg_cnt = 0;
>> >> - u64 data_len;
>> >> - enum dma_data_direction dir;
>> >> + u64 data_len = 0;
>> >> + enum dma_data_direction dir = DMA_NONE;
>> >> int rc;
>> >>
>> >> BUG_ON(!send_ioctx);
>> >> @@ -1584,6 +1584,25 @@ static void srpt_handle_cmd(struct srpt_rdma_ch *ch,
>> >> break;
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> + /*
>> >> + * Call target_init_cmd() before srpt_get_desc_tbl() so that
>> >> + * cmd->se_tfo is set if descriptor parsing fails and
>> >> + * target_send_busy() is used. data_length is filled in after a
>> >> + * successful srpt_get_desc_tbl().
>> >> + *
>> >> + * target_send_busy() is only valid after a successful
>> >> + * target_init_cmd(). On init failure free the tag locally.
>> >> + */
>> >> + rc = target_init_cmd(cmd, ch->sess, &send_ioctx->sense_data[0],
>> >> + scsilun_to_int(&srp_cmd->lun), 0 /* data_len */,
>> >> + TCM_SIMPLE_TAG, DMA_NONE, TARGET_SCF_ACK_KREF);
>> >
>> >1. TCM_SIMPLE_TAG -> you need to rebase to latest rdma-next.
>>
>> I will modify and resend the patch.
>>
>> >2. You are hardcoding dir, while it can be overwritten in srpt_get_desc_tbl().
>>
>> In the srpt_handle_cmd() function:
>> &send_ioctx->cmd;
>> srpt_get_desc_tbl(..., send_ioctx, ...)
>> ioctx->cmd.data_direction = *dir;
>>
>> Therefore, after successfully calling srpt_get_desc_tbl(), even if target_init_cmd() is
>> passed DMA_NONE, cmd->data_direction should already have stored the actual direction.
>>
>> Do you mean that after calling srpt_get_desc_tbl(), displaying the overwritten content
>> would be better?I want to make sure I address the intent of your comment correctly.
>
>You need to do this correctly: target_init_cmd() must receive the
>correct directory, as calculated by srpt_get_desc_tbl().
>
>Thanks
>
>> >
>> >Thanks
>>
>> Thanks,
>> TanZheng
There is a contradiction between the two suggestions:
- Bart suggests calling target_init_cmd() before calling
srpt_get_desc_tbl() (using a placeholder) to ensure that
target_send_busy() can be safely executed if the
descriptor parsing fails.
- Leon points out that target_init_cmd() must receive the
actual data direction calculated by srpt_get_desc_tbl(),
rather than a placeholder like DMA_NONE that will
be overwritten later.
If we continue to modify the current patch, the only way I
can think of is to extract the direction parsing logic from
srpt_get_desc_tbl and place it before target_init_cmd, so
that target_init_cmd can receive the correct direction.
How about this?
Thanks,
TanZheng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-27 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 2:44 [PATCH v2] RDMA/srpt: fix NULL deref when sending BUSY before target_init_cmd() kensanya
[not found] ` <20260723095120.GF110966@unreal>
2026-07-24 2:42 ` kensanya
2026-07-26 7:55 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-07-27 6:39 ` kensanya [this message]
2026-07-27 9:00 ` Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=71e36b0d.4e93.19fa24c787d.Coremail.kensanya@163.com \
--to=kensanya@163.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tanzheng@kylinos.cn \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox