From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dennis Dalessandro Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 0/5] IB/hfi1,isert: Updates for-next 5/15/2018 Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 20:54:05 -0400 Message-ID: <77a63b1c-1307-8533-4a34-b46768627f46@intel.com> References: <20180516012947.12474.2286.stgit@scvm10.sc.intel.com> <38faf50391a9bc1a8d874a32ce5857a4023dff3e.camel@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <38faf50391a9bc1a8d874a32ce5857a4023dff3e.camel@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Doug Ledford , jgg@ziepe.ca Cc: Mike Marciniszyn , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Alex Estrin , stable@vger.kernel.org, Kaike Wan , "Michael J. Ruhl" , Don Dutile , Kamenee Arumugam List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 5/22/2018 3:33 PM, Doug Ledford wrote: > On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 18:31 -0700, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: >> Hi Doug and Jason, >> >> Here are some patches to go to for-next. One is a code cleanup. The rest are >> bug fixes that are probably not serious enough for an -rc6. The one that may be >> on the fence is the isert patch. Since it only affects debug kernels it can >> probably even wait till for-next. It has been marked stable though. >> >> --- >> >> Alex Estrin (1): >> IB/isert: Fix for lib/dma_debug check_sync warning >> >> Kamenee Arumugam (1): >> IB/Hfi1: Mask Unsupported Request error bit in PCIe AER >> >> Michael J. Ruhl (1): >> IB/hfi1: Set port number for errorinfo MAD response >> >> Mike Marciniszyn (2): >> IB/hfi1: Cleanup of exp_rcv >> IB/{rdmavt,hfi1}; Change hrtimer add to use the pinned variation > > Hi Denny, > > I dropped the PCI bit fiddling patch as per comments. Please provide a > more detailed commit message if you want this patch to go in. Kamenee is looking into this some more. Yeah, OK to drop for now, we'll resubmit with at least a better commit message or a different approach depending on her investigation. > I provided my own guestimate of a commit message touchup to the hrtimers > patch. Please let me know if I was wrong in my assumptions there. Sounds good to me, thanks! -Denny