From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Valdis.Kletnieks-PjAqaU27lzQ@public.gmane.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] IB/cxgb4: Fix formatting of physical address Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:52:30 -0500 Message-ID: <7831.1324583550@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> References: <1324430940.2844.144.camel@deadeye> <1324431127.2844.146.camel@deadeye> <1324434950.14214.3.camel@joe2Laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1324583550_2451P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:35:50 PST." <1324434950.14214.3.camel@joe2Laptop> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Joe Perches Cc: Ben Hutchings , Steve Wise , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, LKML List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1324583550_2451P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:35:50 PST, Joe Perches said: > On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 01:32 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Physical addresses may be wider than virtual addresses (e.g. on i386 > > with PAE) and must not be formatted with %p. > [] > > The resource could alternately be formatted with %Pr. > Probably should be unsigned long long I don't have a dog in this fight, but the %Pr sounds better to me. --==_Exmh_1324583550_2451P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFO84p+cC3lWbTT17ARAlyQAKD+hI0oj4y43ZHN4rB1YX9BZnXJIACfZqrh D0CWeD2hmcN0W+pDpL0Owmk= =HFH0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1324583550_2451P-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html