From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from stravinsky.debian.org (stravinsky.debian.org [82.195.75.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25374181CEE for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 16:51:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718211095; cv=none; b=LySMZLvk3zaoP237EmPTxkDEXf8UxU6W3zOcSiRbQ+XyM+0BcFSTYL/5oR7xcfXK0ctjol2scQAqKu86Usd6ILFiG51cmwu3Z/bUynBB27Ml1ojcmOwfpEN0fzJeKK526xlftMusdwsaoJbF6mYySkyp5pXQzPpfyTj0LMjpHHI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718211095; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1aYudvM8cCvp16WoKBbeZwXpUAyDEDsHgfRhHSITuDk=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NGcSE3/VbDHCzx7yHwwlvJMqvafpzrAi2cYvaJrRwDWmWz21E4hLtW+bOyb88PxxKWXYz1BcFiiN/SAEfjl7vKmrFFXTonlEbDvBXAknocUQzCF+Q0HhMwFvac8ogbfUQOfw4uH5UvfTXw/150Opof2LGYq2ycAKrA3VAy/y6gE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=debian.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b=BEh7yi99; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b="BEh7yi99" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; s=smtpauto.stravinsky; h=X-Debian-User:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=1aYudvM8cCvp16WoKBbeZwXpUAyDEDsHgfRhHSITuDk=; b=BEh7yi99eDsMYj+BH9uEhuskk7 hbhzyyBTMxD6VNMqaHKm0y/bs1XgAFBYG1z3ohl0U9pKuG2Dvgr3PE3IMMzeyaHUKn+PxNi/sAt7j WMzWu1dN+N+bu680hSO6KxSAmOqLc89T3+ViBIo28vu7vEkKwHBUMt3FEhiYcgjQY9MW8D1BZtFYC QDFYhye2aQohgeTDE8bvXAVzwHSud+ohXU+/59v6xPlB+raysBBdM0VPusjzZx8A+pmT6sFbBzVDN zr7OmKo1HSejDlt48LLMZkG2V+VQ01w9PE0exfORXtT5sZswfQUkTyW03KDIdy1BH/G9sToCJ69hR yTDMSp/A==; Received: from authenticated user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sHRC7-007yN5-CA for linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 16:51:31 +0000 From: =?utf-8?Q?Pierre-Elliott_B=C3=A9cue?= To: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's the current status with bnxt_re-abi.h In-Reply-To: <87jziucdlj.fsf@daath.pimeys.fr> ("Pierre-Elliott =?utf-8?Q?B?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9cue=22's?= message of "Wed, 12 Jun 2024 18:47:36 +0200") References: <87jziucdlj.fsf@daath.pimeys.fr> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 18:51:23 +0200 Message-ID: <87frticdf8.fsf@daath.pimeys.fr> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Debian-User: peb --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pierre-Elliott B=C3=A9cue wrote on 12/06/2024 at 18:47:36+= 0200: > Hello, > > In bnxt_re-abi.h, the abi version mentioned is 1. It's used as it's in > all libibverbs to determine the min AND max supported ABI. > > bnxt_re isn't currently mainlined in the kernel, Sorry, a word is missing: "Recent bnxt_re isn't currently mainlined" > and those eager to use > the driver need to rely on the one provided by broadcom on their > website. > > The thing is, they bumped their ABI version multiple times (current is > 6). In the current context, one can't use the manually compiled bnxt_re > driver with libibverbs as any call will error due to the bnxt_re abi > version being outside of min/max supported abi version. > > What's the current situation regarding bnxt_re, should we consider > libibverb support of bnxt_re as deprecated? > > Of course I could have missed something, sorry for that if that's the > case. > > Bests, --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJDBAEBCgAtFiEE5CQeth7uIW7ehIz87iFbn7jEWwsFAmZp0gwPHHBlYkBkZWJp YW4ub3JnAAoJEO4hW5+4xFsLlfsQAIJAQoyIfYA74lRhoHwiyoimuxulkbXDZGUK GCanboRTjkoSFDtTbHBYlvsmeMsbdW3wOu94o3irAnlvzgIj+cq1U7KnrE/d0Lev B92dINUfagKHblOylz6ntBSsHrK7bZUhvLaPgVE+w3WbV17flbwxvlNNrw1tjJZL Hk6H23KXfcwazQ4tblCEbeBPFKl41VIbdjqBscVCZJ6dF9At+4nWMG3WKOdu3qMM 7sb6xODaCCAvjWTd9rtFgfbG3xR+fZZCQu5zS/Ks4zSokvCAPpi57Ay6fkQbLHpE MLwJOjFpiA/Osqf4eBnbc/NUBZ8HPb8LaNBART7bMBldDlphrwRZT0cuHCGO6cdF lhlnq5vwf936kOWGeJ9FY66LVWUhI57O6bMgMeDlfZrmqK0sUpPC4pvwrksj59AQ +Q9hlhzEMC8JAjdmHuJNk7q9n5KWaE4phY57DcnNR3GclO4IhhA/I5nBAXUk2eYP pe9npTrLeRNqnFhszNonk/AOfVCe9eq+OsyEmmJW5lpVShWgYR0Jweg7HRV0DKgi H/tkCuggMfxnSWIbAxWlLiUK99lFTfdXx053FjFL28Gl8EP9pNH1ymmJNga7kZNb BLf9FdL3Bz4VvOAyk4PBcqtP6Ug7M6eDxlvKig9dCi6qfvd5CEaAqSLPFAtUk4Xs zcsmqQ5w =18ad -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--