From: "yanjun.zhu" <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>, Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
Cc: zyjzyj2000@gmail.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] RDMA/rxe: Fix unsafe socket release during namespace cleanup
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:31:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b7650f8-2957-4318-841a-473738a605ef@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3bc69e75-1b4b-4bb9-87c4-7db863acc3d2@linux.dev>
On 4/29/26 6:49 AM, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
> 在 2026/4/28 7:26, Leon Romanovsky 写道:
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 01:52:17PM -0700, yanjun.zhu wrote:
>>> On 4/27/26 5:35 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 06:35:22AM +0200, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
>>>>> Since all the sockets are created in rdma link create command
>>>>> and destroyed in rdma link delete command, keeping
>>>>> udp_tunnel_sock_release in rxe_ns_exit risks a "double-free" if
>>>>> the namespace and the device are being cleaned up simultaneously.
>>>>
>>>> Please add a ladder diagram to clarify how it can be possible.
>>>
>>> Hi, Leon
>>>
>>> The double-free occurs as follows:
>>>
>>> CPU 0 (Net NameSpace cleanup) CPU 1 (RDMA device removal)
>>> --------------------- ---------------------------
>>> rxe_ns_exit() rxe_link_delete() (rdma link del )
>>> -> sk = ns_sk->rxe_sk4 -> sk = ns_sk->rxe_sk4
>>> -> udp_tunnel_sock_release(sk)
>>> [Success: First Free] -> udp_tunnel_sock_release(sk)
>>> [Crash: Double Free]
>>>
>>> After removing the socket release logic from rxe_ns_exit(), we ensure
>>> that only the device destruction path (rxe_link_delete) is responsible
>>> for freeing the tunnel sockets, effectively eliminating the double-free
>>> problem.
>>
>> I think it is possible to call rxe_ns_exit() without invoking
>> rxe_link_delete(), and in that case the UDP socket will not be
>> destroyed.
>
> Thanks, my bad. I missed this scenario.
>
> Zhu Yanjun
>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>>
>>> I am not sure if I should put the above into the commit log.
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot.
Hi, Leon
I have performed further tests to verify the execution order and the
necessity of the cleanup code in rxe_ns_exit().
My findings show that a double-free race condition is unlikely because
of how the kernel manages namespace references:
Reference Dependency: The RXE RDMA link holds a reference to the network
namespace.
Order of Execution: When a namespace is deleted while an RDMA link
exists, rxe_ns_exit() is not invoked immediately. It is deferred until
the RDMA link itself is deleted (e.g., via rdma link del), which drops
the final reference count of the namespace.
Redundancy: Consequently, rxe_ns_exit() always follows the device
cleanup path (rxe_link_delete). Since all tunnel sockets are already
released during the device cleanup, the code in rxe_ns_exit() is
redundant and does nothing.
Removing this code simplifies the driver by centralizing socket
destruction in the device management path, where the sockets are
originally created.
This ensures that we don't attempt to release the same resources twice,
even if the destruction is technically serialized by the kernel's
reference counting.
What are your thoughts on this observation?
Thanks,
Zhu Yanjun
>>>
>>> Zhu Yanjun
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 13f2a53c2a71 ("RDMA/rxe: Add net namespace support for IPv4/
>>>>> IPv6 sockets")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_ns.c | 20 --------------------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 20 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_ns.c b/drivers/
>>>>> infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_ns.c
>>>>> index 8b9d734229b2..53add78b8e3a 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_ns.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_ns.c
>>>>> @@ -39,26 +39,6 @@ static void rxe_ns_exit(struct net *net)
>>>>> {
>>>>> /* called when the network namespace is removed
>>>>> */
>>>>> - struct rxe_ns_sock *ns_sk = net_generic(net, rxe_pernet_id);
>>>>> - struct sock *sk;
>>>>> -
>>>>> - rcu_read_lock();
>>>>> - sk = rcu_dereference(ns_sk->rxe_sk4);
>>>>> - rcu_read_unlock();
>>>>> - if (sk) {
>>>>> - rcu_assign_pointer(ns_sk->rxe_sk4, NULL);
>>>>> - udp_tunnel_sock_release(sk->sk_socket);
>>>>> - }
>>>>> -
>>>>> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
>>>>> - rcu_read_lock();
>>>>> - sk = rcu_dereference(ns_sk->rxe_sk6);
>>>>> - rcu_read_unlock();
>>>>> - if (sk) {
>>>>> - rcu_assign_pointer(ns_sk->rxe_sk6, NULL);
>>>>> - udp_tunnel_sock_release(sk->sk_socket);
>>>>> - }
>>>>> -#endif
>>>>> }
>>>>> /*
>>>>> --
>>>>> 2.43.0
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-29 23:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-24 4:35 [PATCH 1/1] RDMA/rxe: Fix unsafe socket release during namespace cleanup Zhu Yanjun
2026-04-27 12:35 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-04-27 20:52 ` yanjun.zhu
2026-04-28 14:26 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-04-29 13:49 ` Zhu Yanjun
2026-04-29 23:31 ` yanjun.zhu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8b7650f8-2957-4318-841a-473738a605ef@linux.dev \
--to=yanjun.zhu@linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox