RE: [PATCH v2 3/4] rsockets: distribute completion queue vectors among multiple cores

[Sreedhar Kodali <srkodali-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>]

On 2014-09-16 10:27, Hefty, Sean wrote:
>> Thanks for your detailed thoughts and insights into comp vector
>> assignment.  As you rightly pointed out, let's hear from wider
>> community as well before we attempt another iteration on the path.
>> I have included below some details about the latest patch to
>> understand where we are currently.
> 
> Are there any similar mechanisms defined elsewhere that we can use as 
> guidance?
> 
> I don't recall, does completion vector 0 refer to a specific vector or
> does it mean use a default assignment?
> 
> - Sean

Hi Sean,

Not sure about similar mechanisms but some references to irq balancing
available on the net.  I think, comp vector 0 is a specific vector that
is used by default.

Thank You.

- Sreedhar

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html