From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sreedhar Kodali Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 3/4] rsockets: distribute completion queue vectors among multiple cores Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:24:02 +0530 Message-ID: <8ef183ac3ab0735f47108b33702f9e46@imap.linux.ibm.com> References: <5409DB0D.6080103@acm.org> <850a2835b5917f6da62af3d1ea0288fd@imap.linux.ibm.com> <540D50E9.5050709@acm.org> <540DF3CC.1060304@acm.org> <5416ABFB.7040701@acm.org> <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A8237399DD3DA8@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A8237399DD3DA8-P5GAC/sN6hkd3b2yrw5b5LfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Hefty, Sean" Cc: Bart Van Assche , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, pradeeps-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org, linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 2014-09-16 10:27, Hefty, Sean wrote: >> Thanks for your detailed thoughts and insights into comp vector >> assignment. As you rightly pointed out, let's hear from wider >> community as well before we attempt another iteration on the path. >> I have included below some details about the latest patch to >> understand where we are currently. > > Are there any similar mechanisms defined elsewhere that we can use as > guidance? > > I don't recall, does completion vector 0 refer to a specific vector or > does it mean use a default assignment? > > - Sean Hi Sean, Not sure about similar mechanisms but some references to irq balancing available on the net. I think, comp vector 0 is a specific vector that is used by default. Thank You. - Sreedhar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html