linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Michael Guralnik <michaelgur@nvidia.com>
Cc: leonro@nvidia.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, maorg@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 rdma-next 5/6] RDMA/mlx5: Cache all user cacheable mkeys on dereg MR flow
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 20:44:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5EzURuqzm8uauMM@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221207085752.82458-6-michaelgur@nvidia.com>

On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 10:57:51AM +0200, Michael Guralnik wrote:
> Currently, when dereging an MR, if the mkey doesn't belong to a cache
> entry, it will be destroyed.
> As a result, the restart of applications with many non-cached mkeys is
> not efficient since all the mkeys are destroyed and then recreated.
> This process takes a long time (for 100,000 MRs, it is ~20 seconds for
> dereg and ~28 seconds for re-reg).
> 
> To shorten the restart runtime, insert all cacheable mkeys to the cache.
> If there is no fitting entry to the mkey properties, create a temporary
> entry that fits it.
> 
> After a predetermined timeout, the cache entries will shrink to the
> initial high limit.
> 
> The mkeys will still be in the cache when consuming them again after an
> application restart. Therefore, the registration will be much faster
> (for 100,000 MRs, it is ~4 seconds for dereg and ~5 seconds for re-reg).
> 
> The temporary cache entries created to store the non-cache mkeys are not
> exposed through sysfs like the default cache entries.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Guralnik <michaelgur@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h | 24 ++++++------
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c      | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h
> index be6d9ec5b127..8f0faa6bc9b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h
> @@ -617,12 +617,25 @@ enum mlx5_mkey_type {
>  	MLX5_MKEY_INDIRECT_DEVX,
>  };
>  
> +struct mlx5r_cache_rb_key {
> +	u8 ats:1;
> +	unsigned int access_mode;
> +	unsigned int access_flags;
> +	/*
> +	 * keep ndescs as the last member so entries with about the same ndescs
> +	 * will be close in the tree
> +	 */
> +	unsigned int ndescs;
> +};
> +
>  struct mlx5_ib_mkey {
>  	u32 key;
>  	enum mlx5_mkey_type type;
>  	unsigned int ndescs;
>  	struct wait_queue_head wait;
>  	refcount_t usecount;
> +	/* User Mkey must hold either a cache_key or a cache_ent. */
> +	struct mlx5r_cache_rb_key rb_key;

What is a cache_key?

Why do we now have ndecs and rb_key.ndescs in the same struct?

>  	struct mlx5_cache_ent *cache_ent;
>  };
>  
> @@ -731,17 +744,6 @@ struct umr_common {
>  	unsigned int state;
>  };
>  
> -struct mlx5r_cache_rb_key {
> -	u8 ats:1;
> -	unsigned int access_mode;
> -	unsigned int access_flags;
> -	/*
> -	 * keep ndescs as the last member so entries with about the same ndescs
> -	 * will be close in the tree
> -	 */
> -	unsigned int ndescs;
> -};

Don't move this, put it where it needs to be in the earlier patch

> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> index 6531e38ef4ec..2e984d436ad5 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> @@ -1096,15 +1096,14 @@ static struct mlx5_ib_mr *alloc_cacheable_mr(struct ib_pd *pd,
>  	rb_key.access_flags = get_unchangeable_access_flags(dev, access_flags);
>  	ent = mkey_cache_ent_from_rb_key(dev, rb_key);
>  	/*
> -	 * Matches access in alloc_cache_mr(). If the MR can't come from the
> -	 * cache then synchronously create an uncached one.
> +	 * If the MR can't come from the cache then synchronously create an uncached
> +	 * one.
>  	 */
> -	if (!ent || ent->limit == 0 ||
> -	    !mlx5r_umr_can_reconfig(dev, 0, access_flags) ||
> -	    mlx5_umem_needs_ats(dev, umem, access_flags)) {
> +	if (!ent) {
>  		mutex_lock(&dev->slow_path_mutex);
>  		mr = reg_create(pd, umem, iova, access_flags, page_size, false);
>  		mutex_unlock(&dev->slow_path_mutex);
> +		mr->mmkey.rb_key = rb_key;
>  		return mr;
>  	}

Does this belong in this patch? Maybe these cleanups need their own patch

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-08  0:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-07  8:57 [PATCH v2 rdma-next 0/6] RDMA/mlx5: Switch MR cache to use RB-tree Michael Guralnik
2022-12-07  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 rdma-next 1/6] RDMA/mlx5: Don't keep umrable 'page_shift' in cache entries Michael Guralnik
2022-12-07  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 rdma-next 2/6] RDMA/mlx5: Remove explicit ODP cache entry Michael Guralnik
2022-12-08  0:02   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-12-08  0:22   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-12-07  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 rdma-next 3/6] RDMA/mlx5: Change the cache structure to RB-tree Michael Guralnik
2022-12-08  0:17   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-12-07  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 rdma-next 4/6] RDMA/mlx5: Introduce mlx5r_cache_rb_key Michael Guralnik
2022-12-08  0:39   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-12-13 12:12     ` Michael Guralnik
2022-12-07  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 rdma-next 5/6] RDMA/mlx5: Cache all user cacheable mkeys on dereg MR flow Michael Guralnik
2022-12-08  0:44   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-12-07  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 rdma-next 6/6] RDMA/mlx5: Add work to remove temporary entries from the cache Michael Guralnik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y5EzURuqzm8uauMM@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maorg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=michaelgur@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).