From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@nvidia.com>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Maor Gottlieb <maorg@nvidia.com>,
Wei Chen <harperchen1110@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next] RDMA/core: Fix resolve_prepare_src error cleanup
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 09:27:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5csPTRDNOIwf49T@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ec81a9d50462d9b9303966176b17b85f7dfbb96a.1670749660.git.leonro@nvidia.com>
On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 11:08:30AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@nvidia.com>
>
> resolve_prepare_src() changes the destination address of the id,
> regardless of success, and on failure zeroes it out.
>
> Instead on function failure keep the original destination address
> of the id.
>
> Since the id could have been already added to the cm id tree and
> zeroing its destination address, could result in a key mismatch or
> multiple ids having the same key(zero) in the tree which could lead to:
Oh, this can't be right
The destination address is variable and it is changed by resolve even
in good cases.
So this part of the rb search is nonsense:
result = compare_netdev_and_ip(
node_id_priv->id.route.addr.dev_addr.bound_dev_if,
cma_dst_addr(node_id_priv), this);
The only way to fix it is to freeze the dst_addr before inserting
things into the rb tree.
ie completely block resolve_prepare_src()
Most probably this suggests that the id is being inserted into the
rbtree at the wrong time, before the dst_add becomes unchangable.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-12 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-11 9:08 [PATCH rdma-next] RDMA/core: Fix resolve_prepare_src error cleanup Leon Romanovsky
2022-12-12 13:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-12-12 13:42 ` Patrisious Haddad
2022-12-12 13:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-12-12 13:55 ` Patrisious Haddad
2022-12-12 14:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-12-12 14:06 ` Patrisious Haddad
2022-12-12 20:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y5csPTRDNOIwf49T@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=harperchen1110@gmail.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maorg@nvidia.com \
--cc=phaddad@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).