From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A67C46467 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 07:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231506AbjAPHRG (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2023 02:17:06 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42326 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231648AbjAPHRG (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2023 02:17:06 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18C0E2681 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2023 23:17:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BEAB60E8E for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 07:17:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74F5FC433EF; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 07:17:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1673853424; bh=hwH6nFZuOZeLRe/ntSkQG3FeAT5i1/9bmsylukm17Ps=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=fTJA0hE7IdfGw49eZToOSctMBcra1uwxDp5y8lt2R3WaOq0wpg02Yu7OXtEnCiSrI KG46SNxT5DBwFyYDjUM4Lrfj9DEEU4w6NwrWL0t33J22hpOEODfE8VOBW4VZOneE8A uwEnEwMPjjaPJmN6Cym3Wo5w4c5o02tl37G6h+2wTsXEMQtHcAka6QEJ+qX5sN46mj cyBosYCzDpcMQRkip2ae+bKY2TqKGdeFJ+hq2ufnLVtcosI/LrqKWBx7xcB4Gw3Ryu cudpGgDppUtG1DUmmjKB5MQ6WzwKNHhMpR+EU7OxF30GFJT29YqPRlhhuM3Ii6O+th WRqQ6eYiLvs0g== Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 09:16:59 +0200 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Dennis Dalessandro Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , Dean Luick , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 0/7] FIXME and other fixes Message-ID: References: <167328561962.1472990.9463955313515395755.stgit@awfm-02.cornelisnetworks.com> <3cf880fa-3374-541f-1996-d30d635db594@cornelisnetworks.com> <472565cb-e99d-95a6-4d20-6a34f77c8cf1@cornelisnetworks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <472565cb-e99d-95a6-4d20-6a34f77c8cf1@cornelisnetworks.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 12:36:51AM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: > On 1/15/23 6:46 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 12:21:50PM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: > >> On 1/10/23 4:03 PM, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: > >>> On 1/10/23 9:58 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > >>>> On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 02:03:58PM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: > >>>>> Dean fixes the FIXME that was left by Jason in the code to use the interval > >>>>> notifier. > >>>> > >>>> ? Which patch did that? > >>> > >>> My fault. The last patch in the previous series [1] was meant to go first here. > >>> I got off by 1 when I was splitting the patches out for submit. > >>> > >>> [1] > >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/167328549178.1472310.9867497376936699488.stgit@awfm-02.cornelisnetworks.com/T/#u > >> > >> As a side effect of this, can we pull patch 2/7 from this series into the RC? > > > > No, everything is in for-rc/for-next now. > > Without that patch there will be a regression in 6.2. I'm lost here. You are saying above that you wanted patch from -rc to be in -next series. However, you wrote about regression in 6.2, which is -rc. > Is there a reason it can't merge into -rc? Here you are asking to bring -next patches to -rc. So please help me, what do you want to do with these branches? 1. -rc 2. -next Options are: 1. keep as is 2. revert 3. anything else? What we won't do: 1. backmerge -next to -rc 2. merge -rc into -next without strong justification, as it is not needed in general because such merge happens during merge window. Thanks