From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: "Pearson, Robert B" <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug Report] RDMA/core: test_qpex.py attempts invalid MW bind operation
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 07:41:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YL704NdV9F15CDtQ@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8d329494-6653-359b-91aa-31ac9dc8122c@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 04:50:20PM -0500, Pearson, Robert B wrote:
> sorry/this time without the HTML.
>
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: test_qp_ex_rc_bind_mw (tests.test_qpex.QpExTestCase)
> Verify bind memory window operation using the new post_send API.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/home/rpearson/src/rdma-core/tests/test_qpex.py", line 292, in
> test_qp_ex_rc_bind_mw
> u.poll_cq(server.cq)
> File "/home/rpearson/src/rdma-core/tests/utils.py", line 538, in poll_cq
> raise PyverbsRDMAError('Completion status is {s}'.
> pyverbs.pyverbs_error.PyverbsRDMAError: Completion status is Memory window
> bind error. Errno: 6, No such device or address
>
> This test attempts to bind a type 2 MW to an MR that does not have bind mw
> access set and expects the test to succeed.
Does the test break after your MW series? Or will it break not-merged
code yet?
Generally speaking, we expect that developers run rdma-core tests and
fixed/extend them prior to the submission.
Thanks
>
> Bob Pearson
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-08 4:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-07 21:50 [Bug Report] RDMA/core: test_qpex.py attempts invalid MW bind operation Pearson, Robert B
2021-06-08 4:41 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2021-06-08 4:54 ` Pearson, Robert B
2021-06-08 6:47 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-06-08 11:53 ` Edward Srouji
2021-06-08 15:54 ` Pearson, Robert B
2021-06-08 16:10 ` Edward Srouji
2021-06-08 16:12 ` Pearson, Robert B
2021-06-08 16:22 ` Pearson, Robert B
2021-06-08 17:14 ` Edward Srouji
2021-06-08 17:36 ` Pearson, Robert B
2021-06-08 16:46 ` Pearson, Robert B
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YL704NdV9F15CDtQ@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpearsonhpe@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox