public inbox for linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, lizhijian@fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: rdma_get_cm_event error behaviour defined?
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 12:32:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YLYasCUuuNMpag2M@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YLYXBD9jupPOslnR@unreal>

* Leon Romanovsky (leon@kernel.org) wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:06:35AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > Hi,
> >   Is 'rdma_get_cm_event's behaviour in initialising **event
> > defined in the error case?
> >   We don't see anything in the manual page, my reading of the
> > code is it's not set/changed in the case of failure - but is
> > that defined?
> >   It would be good if the manpage could explicitly state it.
> 
> AFAIK, the general practice do not rely on any output argument if
> function returns an error and I'm not sure that the man update is
> needed.

The case we had was whether we needed to clean up or not in the error
case; the original code in qemu was:

    2496     ret = rdma_get_cm_event(rdma->channel, &cm_event);
    2497     if (ret) {
    2498         perror("rdma_get_cm_event after rdma_connect");
    2499         ERROR(errp, "connecting to destination!");
    2500         rdma_ack_cm_event(cm_event);
    2501         goto err_rdma_source_connect;
    2502     }

and Li spotted that rdma_ack_cm_event  would seg in the case
rdma_get_cm_event failed.

While I agree on not relying on an output; without a definition you're
stuck between not knowing if you're leaking an event that should
have been cleaned up.

Dave

> Thanks
> 
> > 
> > Dave
> > -- 
> > Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
> > 
> 
-- 
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK


  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-01 11:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-17 10:06 rdma_get_cm_event error behaviour defined? Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-06-01 11:16 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-06-01 11:32   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2021-06-02 12:33     ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-06-02 12:55       ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YLYasCUuuNMpag2M@work-vm \
    --to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizhijian@fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox