public inbox for linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Avihai Horon <avihaih@nvidia.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>,
	Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
	Honggang LI <honli@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 rdma-next] RDMA/mlx5: Enable Relaxed Ordering by default for kernel ULPs
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 10:30:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YNgpM+007Sm/SWhw@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ef0ac51-4c7d-d79d-cb30-2e219f74c8c1@nvidia.com>

On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 10:39:16AM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> 
> On 6/24/2021 9:38 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 02:06:46AM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> > > On 6/9/2021 2:05 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > From: Avihai Horon <avihaih@nvidia.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Relaxed Ordering is a capability that can only benefit users that support
> > > > it. All kernel ULPs should support Relaxed Ordering, as they are designed
> > > > to read data only after observing the CQE and use the DMA API correctly.
> > > > 
> > > > Hence, implicitly enable Relaxed Ordering by default for kernel ULPs.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Avihai Horon <avihaih@nvidia.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > Changelog:
> > > > v2:
> > > >    * Dropped IB/core patch and set RO implicitly in mlx5 exactly like in
> > > >      eth side of mlx5 driver.
> > > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1621505111.git.leonro@nvidia.com
> > > >    * Enabled by default RO in IB/core instead of changing all users
> > > > v0: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210405052404.213889-1-leon@kernel.org
> > > > ---
> > > >    drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c | 10 ++++++----
> > > >    drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/wr.c |  5 ++++-
> > > >    2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> > > > index 3363cde85b14..2182e76ae734 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> > > > @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ static void set_mkc_access_pd_addr_fields(void *mkc, int acc, u64 start_addr,
> > > >    					  struct ib_pd *pd)
> > > >    {
> > > >    	struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev = to_mdev(pd->device);
> > > > +	bool ro_pci_enabled = pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled(dev->mdev->pdev);
> > > >    	MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, a, !!(acc & IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_ATOMIC));
> > > >    	MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, rw, !!(acc & IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_WRITE));
> > > > @@ -78,10 +79,10 @@ static void set_mkc_access_pd_addr_fields(void *mkc, int acc, u64 start_addr,
> > > >    	if (MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev->mdev, relaxed_ordering_write))
> > > >    		MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, relaxed_ordering_write,
> > > > -			 !!(acc & IB_ACCESS_RELAXED_ORDERING));
> > > > +			 acc & IB_ACCESS_RELAXED_ORDERING && ro_pci_enabled);
> > > >    	if (MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev->mdev, relaxed_ordering_read))
> > > >    		MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, relaxed_ordering_read,
> > > > -			 !!(acc & IB_ACCESS_RELAXED_ORDERING));
> > > > +			 acc & IB_ACCESS_RELAXED_ORDERING && ro_pci_enabled);
> > > Jason,
> > > 
> > > If it's still possible to add small change, it will be nice to avoid
> > > calculating "acc & IB_ACCESS_RELAXED_ORDERING && ro_pci_enabled" twice.
> > The patch is part of for-next now, so feel free to send followup patch.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> > index c1e70c99b70c..c4f246c90c4d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> > @@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ static void set_mkc_access_pd_addr_fields(void *mkc, int acc, u64 start_addr,
> >                                            struct ib_pd *pd)
> >   {
> >          struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev = to_mdev(pd->device);
> > -       bool ro_pci_enabled = pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled(dev->mdev->pdev);
> > +       bool ro_pci_enabled = acc & IB_ACCESS_RELAXED_ORDERING &&
> > +                             pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled(dev->mdev->pdev);
> > 
> >          MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, a, !!(acc & IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_ATOMIC));
> >          MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, rw, !!(acc & IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_WRITE));
> > @@ -78,11 +79,9 @@ static void set_mkc_access_pd_addr_fields(void *mkc, int acc, u64 start_addr,
> >          MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, lr, 1);
> > 
> >          if (MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev->mdev, relaxed_ordering_write))
> > -               MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, relaxed_ordering_write,
> > -                        (acc & IB_ACCESS_RELAXED_ORDERING) && ro_pci_enabled);
> > +               MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, relaxed_ordering_write, ro_pci_enabled);
> >          if (MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev->mdev, relaxed_ordering_read))
> > -               MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, relaxed_ordering_read,
> > -                        (acc & IB_ACCESS_RELAXED_ORDERING) && ro_pci_enabled);
> > +               MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, relaxed_ordering_read, ro_pci_enabled);
> > 
> >          MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, pd, to_mpd(pd)->pdn);
> >          MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, qpn, 0xffffff);
> > (END)
> > 
> Yes this looks good.
> 
> Can you/Avihai create a patch from this ? or I'll do it ?

Feel free to send it directly.

Thanks

> 
> 
> > > 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-27  7:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-09 11:05 [PATCH v2 rdma-next] RDMA/mlx5: Enable Relaxed Ordering by default for kernel ULPs Leon Romanovsky
2021-06-09 12:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-09 13:53   ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-06-09 13:59     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-10  7:44       ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-06-09 14:10   ` David Laight
2021-06-09 14:37     ` Chuck Lever III
2021-06-09 15:05       ` David Laight
2021-06-09 15:09         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-06-09 15:48           ` David Laight
2021-06-21 18:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-06-21 20:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-21 23:18     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-06-22  6:20       ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-06-23 23:06 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-06-24  6:38   ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-06-24  7:39     ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-06-24 11:36       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-06-27  7:32         ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-06-27  7:30       ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YNgpM+007Sm/SWhw@unreal \
    --to=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=avihaih@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=honli@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox