From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
To: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: "Marciniszyn, Mike" <mike.marciniszyn@cornelisnetworks.com>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Haakon Bugge <haakon.bugge@oracle.com>,
"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
"Dalessandro, Dennis" <dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: NFS RDMA test failure as of 5.14-rc1
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 07:31:13 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQDdkZ83yYI4US3A@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9D442FCF-D0F8-40F1-9AA1-B85BAE91631A@oracle.com>
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 11:10:25PM +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>
> > On Jul 27, 2021, at 5:20 PM, Marciniszyn, Mike <mike.marciniszyn@cornelisnetworks.com> wrote:
> >
> >>> Haakon's original analysis said that this was an INIT->INIT
> >>> transition, so I'm a bit confused why we lost a RESET->INIT transition
> >>> in the end?
> >>
> >> Perhaps the patch should have removed the ib_modify_qp() from
> >> cma_modify_qp_rtr() instead.
> >
> > I think that will work.
>
> Implemented and tested. It doesn't work. :-)
>
> The conclusion I draw is that there are still spots that depend
> on one or the other of those state transitions remaining where
> they are.
So let's revert this patch.
Thanks
>
> --
> Chuck Lever
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-28 4:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-27 13:43 NFS RDMA test failure as of 5.14-rc1 Marciniszyn, Mike
2021-07-27 17:14 ` Marciniszyn, Mike
2021-07-27 17:26 ` Chuck Lever III
2021-07-27 17:35 ` Marciniszyn, Mike
2021-07-27 17:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-27 17:45 ` Chuck Lever III
2021-07-27 21:20 ` Marciniszyn, Mike
2021-07-27 23:10 ` Chuck Lever III
2021-07-28 4:31 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2021-07-27 18:12 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-07-27 20:17 ` Marciniszyn, Mike
2021-07-28 13:50 ` Marciniszyn, Mike
2021-07-28 17:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-29 18:28 ` Marciniszyn, Mike
2021-08-09 13:38 ` Haakon Bugge
2021-08-09 14:00 ` Chuck Lever III
2021-08-10 15:09 ` Marciniszyn, Mike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YQDdkZ83yYI4US3A@unreal \
--to=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=haakon.bugge@oracle.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.marciniszyn@cornelisnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox