From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ib_srp: Protect the target list with a mutex instead of a spinlock
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 20:44:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ygv0od2d8wXdBLj/@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220215182650.19839-3-bvanassche@acm.org>
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 10:26:49AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> This patch makes the next patch in this series easier to read.
It is not readability change, but move to lock that can sleep (mutex),
which is always good thing.
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
>
> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.h | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
> index e174e853f8a4..2db7429b42e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
> @@ -1062,9 +1062,9 @@ static void srp_remove_target(struct srp_target_port *target)
> kfree(target->ch);
> target->ch = NULL;
>
> - spin_lock(&target->srp_host->target_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&target->srp_host->target_mutex);
> list_del(&target->list);
> - spin_unlock(&target->srp_host->target_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&target->srp_host->target_mutex);
>
> scsi_host_put(target->scsi_host);
> }
> @@ -3146,9 +3146,9 @@ static int srp_add_target(struct srp_host *host, struct srp_target_port *target)
> rport->lld_data = target;
> target->rport = rport;
>
> - spin_lock(&host->target_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&host->target_mutex);
> list_add_tail(&target->list, &host->target_list);
> - spin_unlock(&host->target_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&host->target_mutex);
>
> scsi_scan_target(&target->scsi_host->shost_gendev,
> 0, target->scsi_id, SCAN_WILD_CARD, SCSI_SCAN_INITIAL);
> @@ -3203,7 +3203,7 @@ static bool srp_conn_unique(struct srp_host *host,
>
> ret = true;
>
> - spin_lock(&host->target_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&host->target_mutex);
> list_for_each_entry(t, &host->target_list, list) {
> if (t != target &&
> target->id_ext == t->id_ext &&
> @@ -3213,7 +3213,7 @@ static bool srp_conn_unique(struct srp_host *host,
> break;
> }
> }
> - spin_unlock(&host->target_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&host->target_mutex);
>
> out:
> return ret;
> @@ -3898,7 +3898,7 @@ static struct srp_host *srp_add_port(struct srp_device *device, u8 port)
> return NULL;
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&host->target_list);
> - spin_lock_init(&host->target_lock);
> + mutex_init(&host->target_mutex);
> init_completion(&host->released);
> mutex_init(&host->add_target_mutex);
> host->srp_dev = device;
> @@ -4041,10 +4041,10 @@ static void srp_remove_one(struct ib_device *device, void *client_data)
> /*
> * Remove all target ports.
> */
> - spin_lock(&host->target_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&host->target_mutex);
> list_for_each_entry(target, &host->target_list, list)
> srp_queue_remove_work(target);
> - spin_unlock(&host->target_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&host->target_mutex);
>
> /*
> * Wait for tl_err and target port removal tasks.
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.h b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.h
> index 55a575e2cace..2af968277994 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.h
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.h
> @@ -116,14 +116,14 @@ struct srp_device {
> * One port of an RDMA adapter in the initiator system.
> *
> * @target_list: List of connected target ports (struct srp_target_port).
> - * @target_lock: Protects @target_list.
> + * @target_mutex: Protects @target_list.
> */
> struct srp_host {
> struct srp_device *srp_dev;
> u8 port;
> struct device dev;
> struct list_head target_list;
> - spinlock_t target_lock;
> + struct mutex target_mutex;
> struct completion released;
> struct list_head list;
> struct mutex add_target_mutex;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-15 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-15 18:26 [PATCH 0/3] Fix a deadlock in the ib_srp driver Bart Van Assche
2022-02-15 18:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] ib_srp: Add more documentation Bart Van Assche
2022-02-15 18:42 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-02-15 20:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-02-16 7:02 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-02-15 18:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] ib_srp: Protect the target list with a mutex instead of a spinlock Bart Van Assche
2022-02-15 18:44 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2022-02-15 20:35 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-02-15 18:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] ib_srp: Fix a deadlock Bart Van Assche
2022-02-15 18:51 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-02-15 20:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-02-15 20:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-02-15 20:50 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ygv0od2d8wXdBLj/@unreal \
--to=leonro@mellanox.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox