public inbox for linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Wenpeng Liang <liangwenpeng@huawei.com>
Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 7/8] RDMA/hns: Refactor the alloc_srqc()
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:35:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YheJtTpU04bYtvNm@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220218110519.37375-8-liangwenpeng@huawei.com>

On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 07:05:18PM +0800, Wenpeng Liang wrote:
> From: Chengchang Tang <tangchengchang@huawei.com>
> 
> Abstract the alloc_srqc() into several parts and separate the alloc_srqn()
> from the alloc_srqc().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chengchang Tang <tangchengchang@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wenpeng Liang <liangwenpeng@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_srq.c | 80 +++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_srq.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_srq.c
> index e316276e18c2..2613889a02ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_srq.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_srq.c
> @@ -59,40 +59,39 @@ static void hns_roce_ib_srq_event(struct hns_roce_srq *srq,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static int alloc_srqc(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, struct hns_roce_srq *srq)
> +static int alloc_srqn(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, struct hns_roce_srq *srq)
>  {
> -	struct hns_roce_srq_table *srq_table = &hr_dev->srq_table;
>  	struct hns_roce_ida *srq_ida = &hr_dev->srq_table.srq_ida;
> -	struct ib_device *ibdev = &hr_dev->ib_dev;
> -	struct hns_roce_cmd_mailbox *mailbox;
> -	int ret;
>  	int id;
>  
>  	id = ida_alloc_range(&srq_ida->ida, srq_ida->min, srq_ida->max,
>  			     GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (id < 0) {
> -		ibdev_err(ibdev, "failed to alloc srq(%d).\n", id);
> +		ibdev_err(&hr_dev->ib_dev, "failed to alloc srq(%d).\n", id);
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
> -	srq->srqn = (unsigned long)id;
>  
> -	ret = hns_roce_table_get(hr_dev, &srq_table->table, srq->srqn);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		ibdev_err(ibdev, "failed to get SRQC table, ret = %d.\n", ret);
> -		goto err_out;
> -	}
> +	srq->srqn = id;
>  
> -	ret = xa_err(xa_store(&srq_table->xa, srq->srqn, srq, GFP_KERNEL));
> -	if (ret) {
> -		ibdev_err(ibdev, "failed to store SRQC, ret = %d.\n", ret);
> -		goto err_put;
> -	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void free_srqn(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, struct hns_roce_srq *srq)
> +{
> +	ida_free(&hr_dev->srq_table.srq_ida.ida, (int)srq->srqn);
> +}
> +
> +static int hns_roce_create_srqc(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev,
> +				struct hns_roce_srq *srq)
> +{
> +	struct ib_device *ibdev = &hr_dev->ib_dev;
> +	struct hns_roce_cmd_mailbox *mailbox;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	mailbox = hns_roce_alloc_cmd_mailbox(hr_dev);
>  	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mailbox)) {

hns_roce_alloc_cmd_mailbox() never returns NULL, so the check should be IS_ERR()

Thanks

>  		ibdev_err(ibdev, "failed to alloc mailbox for SRQC.\n");
> -		ret = -ENOMEM;
> -		goto err_xa;
> +		return PTR_ERR(mailbox);
>  	}
>  
>  	ret = hr_dev->hw->write_srqc(srq, mailbox->buf);
> @@ -103,23 +102,42 @@ static int alloc_srqc(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, struct hns_roce_srq *srq)
>  
>  	ret = hns_roce_create_hw_ctx(hr_dev, mailbox, HNS_ROCE_CMD_CREATE_SRQ,
>  				     srq->srqn);
> -	if (ret) {
> +	if (ret)
>  		ibdev_err(ibdev, "failed to config SRQC, ret = %d.\n", ret);
> -		goto err_mbox;
> -	}
>  
> +err_mbox:
>  	hns_roce_free_cmd_mailbox(hr_dev, mailbox);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int alloc_srqc(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, struct hns_roce_srq *srq)
> +{
> +	struct hns_roce_srq_table *srq_table = &hr_dev->srq_table;
> +	struct ib_device *ibdev = &hr_dev->ib_dev;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = hns_roce_table_get(hr_dev, &srq_table->table, srq->srqn);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		ibdev_err(ibdev, "failed to get SRQC table, ret = %d.\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = xa_err(xa_store(&srq_table->xa, srq->srqn, srq, GFP_KERNEL));
> +	if (ret) {
> +		ibdev_err(ibdev, "failed to store SRQC, ret = %d.\n", ret);
> +		goto err_put;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = hns_roce_create_srqc(hr_dev, srq);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_xa;
>  
>  	return 0;
>  
> -err_mbox:
> -	hns_roce_free_cmd_mailbox(hr_dev, mailbox);
>  err_xa:
>  	xa_erase(&srq_table->xa, srq->srqn);
>  err_put:
>  	hns_roce_table_put(hr_dev, &srq_table->table, srq->srqn);
> -err_out:
> -	ida_free(&srq_ida->ida, id);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -142,7 +160,6 @@ static void free_srqc(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, struct hns_roce_srq *srq)
>  	wait_for_completion(&srq->free);
>  
>  	hns_roce_table_put(hr_dev, &srq_table->table, srq->srqn);
> -	ida_free(&srq_table->srq_ida.ida, (int)srq->srqn);
>  }
>  
>  static int alloc_srq_idx(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, struct hns_roce_srq *srq,
> @@ -390,10 +407,14 @@ int hns_roce_create_srq(struct ib_srq *ib_srq,
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	ret = alloc_srqc(hr_dev, srq);
> +	ret = alloc_srqn(hr_dev, srq);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto err_srq_buf;
>  
> +	ret = alloc_srqc(hr_dev, srq);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_srqn;
> +
>  	if (udata) {
>  		resp.srqn = srq->srqn;
>  		if (ib_copy_to_udata(udata, &resp,
> @@ -412,6 +433,8 @@ int hns_roce_create_srq(struct ib_srq *ib_srq,
>  
>  err_srqc:
>  	free_srqc(hr_dev, srq);
> +err_srqn:
> +	free_srqn(hr_dev, srq);
>  err_srq_buf:
>  	free_srq_buf(hr_dev, srq);
>  
> @@ -424,6 +447,7 @@ int hns_roce_destroy_srq(struct ib_srq *ibsrq, struct ib_udata *udata)
>  	struct hns_roce_srq *srq = to_hr_srq(ibsrq);
>  
>  	free_srqc(hr_dev, srq);
> +	free_srqn(hr_dev, srq);
>  	free_srq_buf(hr_dev, srq);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.33.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-24 13:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-18 11:05 [PATCH for-next 0/8] RDMA/hns: Clean up and refactor mailbox-related code Wenpeng Liang
2022-02-18 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next 1/8] RDMA/hns: Remove the unused parameter "op_modifier" in mailbox Wenpeng Liang
2022-02-24 13:30   ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-02-18 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next 2/8] RDMA/hns: Remove fixed parameter “timeout” in the mailbox Wenpeng Liang
2022-02-24 13:31   ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-02-18 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next 3/8] RDMA/hns: Remove redundant parameter "mailbox" " Wenpeng Liang
2022-02-24 13:31   ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-02-18 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next 4/8] RDMA/hns: Fix the wrong type of parameter "op" of " Wenpeng Liang
2022-02-24 13:31   ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-02-18 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next 5/8] RDMA/hns: Refactor mailbox functions Wenpeng Liang
2022-02-24 13:30   ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-02-25 10:50     ` Wenpeng Liang
2022-02-18 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next 6/8] RDMA/hns: Remove similar code that configures the hardware contexts Wenpeng Liang
2022-02-24 13:32   ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-02-18 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next 7/8] RDMA/hns: Refactor the alloc_srqc() Wenpeng Liang
2022-02-24 13:35   ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2022-02-25 10:53     ` Wenpeng Liang
2022-02-18 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next 8/8] RDMA/hns: Refactor the alloc_cqc() Wenpeng Liang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YheJtTpU04bYtvNm@unreal \
    --to=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=liangwenpeng@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox