From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Wenpeng Liang <liangwenpeng@huawei.com>
Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 7/8] RDMA/hns: Refactor the alloc_srqc()
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:35:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YheJtTpU04bYtvNm@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220218110519.37375-8-liangwenpeng@huawei.com>
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 07:05:18PM +0800, Wenpeng Liang wrote:
> From: Chengchang Tang <tangchengchang@huawei.com>
>
> Abstract the alloc_srqc() into several parts and separate the alloc_srqn()
> from the alloc_srqc().
>
> Signed-off-by: Chengchang Tang <tangchengchang@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wenpeng Liang <liangwenpeng@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_srq.c | 80 +++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_srq.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_srq.c
> index e316276e18c2..2613889a02ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_srq.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_srq.c
> @@ -59,40 +59,39 @@ static void hns_roce_ib_srq_event(struct hns_roce_srq *srq,
> }
> }
>
> -static int alloc_srqc(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, struct hns_roce_srq *srq)
> +static int alloc_srqn(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, struct hns_roce_srq *srq)
> {
> - struct hns_roce_srq_table *srq_table = &hr_dev->srq_table;
> struct hns_roce_ida *srq_ida = &hr_dev->srq_table.srq_ida;
> - struct ib_device *ibdev = &hr_dev->ib_dev;
> - struct hns_roce_cmd_mailbox *mailbox;
> - int ret;
> int id;
>
> id = ida_alloc_range(&srq_ida->ida, srq_ida->min, srq_ida->max,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (id < 0) {
> - ibdev_err(ibdev, "failed to alloc srq(%d).\n", id);
> + ibdev_err(&hr_dev->ib_dev, "failed to alloc srq(%d).\n", id);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> - srq->srqn = (unsigned long)id;
>
> - ret = hns_roce_table_get(hr_dev, &srq_table->table, srq->srqn);
> - if (ret) {
> - ibdev_err(ibdev, "failed to get SRQC table, ret = %d.\n", ret);
> - goto err_out;
> - }
> + srq->srqn = id;
>
> - ret = xa_err(xa_store(&srq_table->xa, srq->srqn, srq, GFP_KERNEL));
> - if (ret) {
> - ibdev_err(ibdev, "failed to store SRQC, ret = %d.\n", ret);
> - goto err_put;
> - }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void free_srqn(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, struct hns_roce_srq *srq)
> +{
> + ida_free(&hr_dev->srq_table.srq_ida.ida, (int)srq->srqn);
> +}
> +
> +static int hns_roce_create_srqc(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev,
> + struct hns_roce_srq *srq)
> +{
> + struct ib_device *ibdev = &hr_dev->ib_dev;
> + struct hns_roce_cmd_mailbox *mailbox;
> + int ret;
>
> mailbox = hns_roce_alloc_cmd_mailbox(hr_dev);
> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mailbox)) {
hns_roce_alloc_cmd_mailbox() never returns NULL, so the check should be IS_ERR()
Thanks
> ibdev_err(ibdev, "failed to alloc mailbox for SRQC.\n");
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto err_xa;
> + return PTR_ERR(mailbox);
> }
>
> ret = hr_dev->hw->write_srqc(srq, mailbox->buf);
> @@ -103,23 +102,42 @@ static int alloc_srqc(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, struct hns_roce_srq *srq)
>
> ret = hns_roce_create_hw_ctx(hr_dev, mailbox, HNS_ROCE_CMD_CREATE_SRQ,
> srq->srqn);
> - if (ret) {
> + if (ret)
> ibdev_err(ibdev, "failed to config SRQC, ret = %d.\n", ret);
> - goto err_mbox;
> - }
>
> +err_mbox:
> hns_roce_free_cmd_mailbox(hr_dev, mailbox);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int alloc_srqc(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, struct hns_roce_srq *srq)
> +{
> + struct hns_roce_srq_table *srq_table = &hr_dev->srq_table;
> + struct ib_device *ibdev = &hr_dev->ib_dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = hns_roce_table_get(hr_dev, &srq_table->table, srq->srqn);
> + if (ret) {
> + ibdev_err(ibdev, "failed to get SRQC table, ret = %d.\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = xa_err(xa_store(&srq_table->xa, srq->srqn, srq, GFP_KERNEL));
> + if (ret) {
> + ibdev_err(ibdev, "failed to store SRQC, ret = %d.\n", ret);
> + goto err_put;
> + }
> +
> + ret = hns_roce_create_srqc(hr_dev, srq);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_xa;
>
> return 0;
>
> -err_mbox:
> - hns_roce_free_cmd_mailbox(hr_dev, mailbox);
> err_xa:
> xa_erase(&srq_table->xa, srq->srqn);
> err_put:
> hns_roce_table_put(hr_dev, &srq_table->table, srq->srqn);
> -err_out:
> - ida_free(&srq_ida->ida, id);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -142,7 +160,6 @@ static void free_srqc(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, struct hns_roce_srq *srq)
> wait_for_completion(&srq->free);
>
> hns_roce_table_put(hr_dev, &srq_table->table, srq->srqn);
> - ida_free(&srq_table->srq_ida.ida, (int)srq->srqn);
> }
>
> static int alloc_srq_idx(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, struct hns_roce_srq *srq,
> @@ -390,10 +407,14 @@ int hns_roce_create_srq(struct ib_srq *ib_srq,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = alloc_srqc(hr_dev, srq);
> + ret = alloc_srqn(hr_dev, srq);
> if (ret)
> goto err_srq_buf;
>
> + ret = alloc_srqc(hr_dev, srq);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_srqn;
> +
> if (udata) {
> resp.srqn = srq->srqn;
> if (ib_copy_to_udata(udata, &resp,
> @@ -412,6 +433,8 @@ int hns_roce_create_srq(struct ib_srq *ib_srq,
>
> err_srqc:
> free_srqc(hr_dev, srq);
> +err_srqn:
> + free_srqn(hr_dev, srq);
> err_srq_buf:
> free_srq_buf(hr_dev, srq);
>
> @@ -424,6 +447,7 @@ int hns_roce_destroy_srq(struct ib_srq *ibsrq, struct ib_udata *udata)
> struct hns_roce_srq *srq = to_hr_srq(ibsrq);
>
> free_srqc(hr_dev, srq);
> + free_srqn(hr_dev, srq);
> free_srq_buf(hr_dev, srq);
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.33.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-24 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-18 11:05 [PATCH for-next 0/8] RDMA/hns: Clean up and refactor mailbox-related code Wenpeng Liang
2022-02-18 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next 1/8] RDMA/hns: Remove the unused parameter "op_modifier" in mailbox Wenpeng Liang
2022-02-24 13:30 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-02-18 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next 2/8] RDMA/hns: Remove fixed parameter “timeout” in the mailbox Wenpeng Liang
2022-02-24 13:31 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-02-18 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next 3/8] RDMA/hns: Remove redundant parameter "mailbox" " Wenpeng Liang
2022-02-24 13:31 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-02-18 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next 4/8] RDMA/hns: Fix the wrong type of parameter "op" of " Wenpeng Liang
2022-02-24 13:31 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-02-18 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next 5/8] RDMA/hns: Refactor mailbox functions Wenpeng Liang
2022-02-24 13:30 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-02-25 10:50 ` Wenpeng Liang
2022-02-18 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next 6/8] RDMA/hns: Remove similar code that configures the hardware contexts Wenpeng Liang
2022-02-24 13:32 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-02-18 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next 7/8] RDMA/hns: Refactor the alloc_srqc() Wenpeng Liang
2022-02-24 13:35 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2022-02-25 10:53 ` Wenpeng Liang
2022-02-18 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next 8/8] RDMA/hns: Refactor the alloc_cqc() Wenpeng Liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YheJtTpU04bYtvNm@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=liangwenpeng@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox