public inbox for linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: matanb@mellanox.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bug report] net/mlx4_core: Support more than 64 VFs
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 15:18:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yot7loyr9xVwMHZR@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YmLMmEOcUrTRjqvh@kili>

On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 06:41:12PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hello Matan Barak,
> 
> The patch de966c592802: "net/mlx4_core: Support more than 64 VFs"
> from Nov 13, 2014, leads to the following Smatch static checker
> warning:
> 
> 	drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c:3455 mlx4_load_one()
> 	warn: missing error code 'err'
> 
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
>     3438         if (mlx4_is_master(dev)) {
>     3439                 /* when we hit the goto slave_start below, dev_cap already initialized */
>     3440                 if (!dev_cap) {
>     3441                         dev_cap = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev_cap), GFP_KERNEL);
>     3442 
>     3443                         if (!dev_cap) {
>     3444                                 err = -ENOMEM;
>     3445                                 goto err_fw;
>     3446                         }
>     3447 
>     3448                         err = mlx4_QUERY_DEV_CAP(dev, dev_cap);
>     3449                         if (err) {
>     3450                                 mlx4_err(dev, "QUERY_DEV_CAP command failed, aborting.\n");
>     3451                                 goto err_fw;
>     3452                         }
>     3453 
>     3454                         if (mlx4_check_dev_cap(dev, dev_cap, nvfs))
> --> 3455                                 goto err_fw;
>                                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Should this have an error code?

I don't think so. Failure here means that more than 64 VFs were
requested for unsupported device. In such case, we will perform same
flow as for failure in SR-IOV a couple of lines below - graceful exit.

It is hard to say if it is correct behaviour, but I won't change
anything for such old driver.

Thanks

      reply	other threads:[~2022-05-23 12:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-22 15:41 [bug report] net/mlx4_core: Support more than 64 VFs Dan Carpenter
2022-05-23 12:18 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yot7loyr9xVwMHZR@unreal \
    --to=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matanb@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox