From: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Harshitha Ramamurthy <hramamurthy@google.com>,
"moderated list:INTEL ETHERNET DRIVERS"
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@google.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:MELLANOX MLX4 core VPI driver"
<linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Praveen Kaligineedi <pkaligineedi@google.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Shailend Chand <shailend@google.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
Ziwei Xiao <ziweixiao@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/6] Cleanup IRQ affinity checks in several drivers
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 13:12:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZryfGDU9wHE0IrvZ@LQ3V64L9R2.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZrxZaHGDTO3ohHFH@LQ3V64L9R2.home>
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 08:14:48AM +0100, Joe Damato wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 05:17:10PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 14:56:21 +0000 Joe Damato wrote:
> > > Several drivers make a check in their napi poll functions to determine
> > > if the CPU affinity of the IRQ has changed. If it has, the napi poll
> > > function returns a value less than the budget to force polling mode to
> > > be disabled, so that it can be rescheduled on the correct CPU next time
> > > the softirq is raised.
> >
> > Any reason not to use the irq number already stored in napi_struct ?
>
> Thanks for taking a look.
>
> IIUC, that's possible if i40e, iavf, and gve are updated to call
> netif_napi_set_irq first, which I could certainly do.
>
> But as Stanislav points out, I would be adding a call to
> irq_get_effective_affinity_mask in the hot path where one did not
> exist before for 4 of 5 drivers.
>
> In that case, it might make more sense to introduce:
>
> bool napi_affinity_no_change(const struct cpumask *aff_mask)
>
> instead and the drivers which have a cached mask can pass it in and
> gve can be updated later to cache it.
>
> Not sure how crucial avoiding the irq_get_effective_affinity_mask
> call is; I would guess maybe some driver owners would object to
> adding a new call in the hot path where one didn't exist before.
>
> What do you think?
Actually... how about a slightly different approach, which caches
the affinity mask in the core?
0. Extend napi struct to have a struct cpumask * field
1. extend netif_napi_set_irq to:
a. store the IRQ number in the napi struct (as you suggested)
b. call irq_get_effective_affinity_mask to store the mask in the
napi struct
c. set up generic affinity_notify.notify and
affinity_notify.release callbacks to update the in core mask
when it changes
2. add napi_affinity_no_change which now takes a napi_struct
3. cleanup all 5 drivers:
a. add calls to netif_napi_set_irq for all 5 (I think no RTNL
is needed, so I think this would be straight forward?)
b. remove all affinity_mask caching code in 4 of 5 drivers
c. update all 5 drivers to call napi_affinity_no_change in poll
Then ... anyone who adds support for netif_napi_set_irq to their
driver in the future gets automatic support in-core for
caching/updating of the mask? And in the future netdev-genl could
dump the mask since its in-core?
I'll mess around with that locally to see how it looks, but let me
know if that sounds like a better overall approach.
- Joe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-14 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-12 14:56 [RFC net-next 0/6] Cleanup IRQ affinity checks in several drivers Joe Damato
2024-08-12 14:56 ` [RFC net-next 2/6] mlx5: Use napi_affinity_no_change Joe Damato
2024-08-12 14:56 ` [RFC net-next 6/6] mlx4: " Joe Damato
2024-08-14 0:17 ` [RFC net-next 0/6] Cleanup IRQ affinity checks in several drivers Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-14 7:14 ` Joe Damato
2024-08-14 12:12 ` Joe Damato [this message]
2024-08-14 15:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-14 15:19 ` Joe Damato
2024-08-14 16:03 ` Shay Drori
2024-08-14 18:01 ` Joe Damato
2024-08-15 0:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-15 10:22 ` Joe Damato
2024-08-20 6:40 ` Shay Drori
2024-08-20 8:33 ` Joe Damato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZryfGDU9wHE0IrvZ@LQ3V64L9R2.home \
--to=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hramamurthy@google.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jeroendb@google.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pkaligineedi@google.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=shailend@google.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
--cc=ziweixiao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox