From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>, "Ewan D. Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: enforce unlimited max_segment_size when virt_boundary_mask is set
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 17:50:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFkjfv67LK0EpAC3@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250623080326.48714-3-hch@lst.de>
On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 10:02:54AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The virt_boundary_mask limit requires an unlimited max_segment_size for
> bio splitting to not corrupt data. Historically, the block layer tried
> to validate this, although the check was half-hearted until the addition
> of the atomic queue limits API. The full blown check than triggered
> issues with stacked devices incorrectly inheriting limits such as the
> virt boundary and got disabled in commit b561ea56a264 ("block: allow
> device to have both virt_boundary_mask and max segment size") instead of
> fixing the issue properly.
>
> Ensure that the SCSI mid layer doesn't set the default low
> max_segment_size limit for this case, and check for invalid
> max_segment_size values in the host template, similar to the original
> block layer check given that SCSI devices can't be stacked.
>
> This fixes reported data corruption on storvsc, although as far as I can
> tell storvsc always failed to properly set the max_segment_size limit as
> the SCSI APIs historically applied that when setting up the host, while
> storvsc only set the virt_boundary_mask when configuring the scsi_device.
>
> Fixes: 81988a0e6b03 ("storvsc: get rid of bounce buffer")
> Fixes: b561ea56a264 ("block: allow device to have both virt_boundary_mask and max segment size")
> Reported-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-23 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-23 8:02 fix virt_boundary_mask handling in SCSI Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-23 8:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] RDMA/srp: don't set a max_segment_size when virt_boundary_mask is set Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-23 15:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-06-24 5:57 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-06-23 8:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: enforce unlimited " Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-23 8:37 ` John Garry
2025-06-23 13:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-23 14:03 ` John Garry
2025-06-23 14:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-23 9:50 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-06-24 5:57 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-06-24 14:21 ` fix virt_boundary_mask handling in SCSI Laurence Oberman
2025-06-24 16:11 ` Laurence Oberman
2025-06-24 16:13 ` Laurence Oberman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-06-24 12:52 fix virt_boundary_mask handling in SCSI v2 Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-24 12:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: enforce unlimited max_segment_size when virt_boundary_mask is set Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-24 15:56 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFkjfv67LK0EpAC3@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).