From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 5/6] RDMA CM: Netlink Client Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:14:29 -0800 Message-ID: References: <1294068834-17778-1-git-send-email-nirm@voltaire.com> <1294068834-17778-6-git-send-email-nirm@voltaire.com> <20110107203742.GH1211@obsidianresearch.com> <4D3417E1.9090903@voltaire.com> <20110117221141.GE995@obsidianresearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110117221141.GE995-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> (Jason Gunthorpe's message of "Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:11:41 -0700") Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Or Gerlitz , Nir Muchtar , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > I also think that introducing a new user space interface that has to > remain the same forever is not to be done lightly. I'd love to also > hear from the netdev folks what they think of the schema. I think it > is sort of like sysfs, a lot of variation and opinions on what is > right.. Is the schema documented anywhere, or does one have to read it from the code? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html