public inbox for linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: David Brean <David.Brean-UdXhSnd/wVw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-rdma <linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: strong ordering for data registered memory
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:06:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ada639gvezo.fsf@roland-alpha.cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AFB2EA5.4030804-UdXhSnd/wVw@public.gmane.org> (David Brean's message of "Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:37:41 -0500")


 > I decided to minimize the impact of an API change on the class of
 > applications that use the current verbs interface because those
 > applications can safely run on platforms that deliver optimal
 > performance using weak ordering for data buffers.  New binaries aren't
 > required for this class of application.
 > 
 > I thought it would be more appropriate to put the burden of added
 > complexity on the class of applications that bypass the verbs to
 > access special features in the hardware.  In fact, those applications
 > are selective about memory regions that need this special handling and
 > would register lots of memory without the "strong ordering' bit.  How
 > applications determine that the platform is capable of performing the
 > request would be beyond the scope of the verbs, however, I suppose
 > that the verbs framework could check and return an error.
 > 
 > If there are applications that expect the hardware to support "strong
 > ordering" and don't check the hardware, then these might be a problem.
 > Do any of these exists?
 > 
 > By the way, if I had proposed this bit several years ago, then I would
 > have chosen a "weak ordering" flag.  Instead, I decided to try
 > protecting the existing base of verbs-based software.

I can't really follow this.  Right now Open MPI et al assume that if
they see a Mellanox adapter, they get the "last byte of RDMA becomes
visible last" behavior.  And there is not a way that I know of to turn
this off at all, let alone get any performance difference.  The
exception being the Cell processor system that started the previous
discussion, where weak ordering at the platform level helped things.

But given that current software does seem to rely on ordering, it seems
that opting into weak ordering would break fewer applications.

 - R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-11 23:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-10 20:19 strong ordering for data registered memory David Brean
     [not found] ` <4AF9CACE.8070700-UdXhSnd/wVw@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-11 17:57   ` Roland Dreier
     [not found]     ` <adaskclvta4.fsf-BjVyx320WGW9gfZ95n9DRSW4+XlvGpQz@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-11 18:16       ` Richard Frank
     [not found]         ` <4AFAFF7A.4090602-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-11 22:11           ` David Brean
     [not found]             ` <4AFB3677.6050603-UdXhSnd/wVw@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-11 22:44               ` Richard Frank
     [not found]                 ` <4AFB3E6B.3080606-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-11 23:13                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
     [not found]                     ` <20091111231338.GZ1966-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-12  5:41                       ` Dave Olson
2009-11-12 20:43                       ` David Brean
2009-11-11 21:37       ` David Brean
     [not found]         ` <4AFB2EA5.4030804-UdXhSnd/wVw@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-11 23:06           ` Roland Dreier [this message]
     [not found]             ` <ada639gvezo.fsf-BjVyx320WGW9gfZ95n9DRSW4+XlvGpQz@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-12 20:42               ` David Brean
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-12 21:51 Caitlin Bestler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ada639gvezo.fsf@roland-alpha.cisco.com \
    --to=rdreier-fyb4gu1cfyuavxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=David.Brean-UdXhSnd/wVw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox