From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: kitten - mlx4: Unhandled interrupt - owner bit Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:00:55 -0800 Message-ID: References: <4B97B4BE.1050809@hpce.nec.com> <20100310163521.GB18440@mtldesk030.lab.mtl.com> <4B97F587.3000209@hpce.nec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4B97F587.3000209-e+cCxrzAqRFWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> (Fredrik Unger's message of "Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:39:51 +0100") Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Fredrik Unger Cc: Eli Cohen , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > To clarify I checked each of the statements separatly and from what I > could gather > (eqe->owner & 0x80) was true and > (eq->cons_index & eq->nent) false. > But true! As I am not sure what each statement hides, > I do not know if both should be false or true for the eqe to be > returned. Will try to check the cons_index closer. As the '^' (XOR) implies, they should be the same for the EQE to be returned. > Where could I find out more about owner and cons_index / nent ? The ConnectX programmer's reference manual is what you need. -- Roland Dreier For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html