From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/2] Add support for enhanced atomic operations Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:49:05 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20100310155749.GA25964@vlad-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Roland Dreier's message of "Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:53:35 -0800") Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=A5kon?= Bugge Cc: vlad-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org, linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > Hence, I think it would be cleaner if a new capability, > masked_atomic_cap, were introduced, using the original definitions > (NONE, HCA, GLOB). Vlad, what do you think about that? The more I think about it, the cleaner this seems to me. And it doesn't even consume a device capability flag bit, which is a nice bonus. -- Roland Dreier For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html