From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: [PATCH] rdma_cm.h: Fix SCTP protocol ID Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:21:07 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20100113192454.GA17655@comcast.net> <7E10F17E68C24836BE68F8F22B64862B@amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <7E10F17E68C24836BE68F8F22B64862B-Zpru7NauK7drdx17CPfAsdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> (Sean Hefty's message of "Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:11:52 -0800") Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Sean Hefty Cc: Hal Rosenstock , rolandd-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > Technically, I believe it's available to userspace, though the librdmacm doesn't > define it. I'd be surprised if anything uses it. Wouldn't trying to use RDMA_PS_SCTP hit the default: return -EPROTONOSUPPORT; case in cma_get_port()? So one couldn't actually do anything with RDMA_PS_SCTP? Or is there some way to avoid binding? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html