From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/addr: Use appropriate locking with for_each_netdev() Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:48:24 -0800 Message-ID: References: <4AF8EBA4.2070102@gmail.com> <8C10E584257A46DB9A0AD193520CF4A7@amr.corp.intel.com> <4B0628E0.6000404@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4B0628E0.6000404-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> (Eric Dumazet's message of "Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:28:00 +0100") Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Sean Hefty , "David S. Miller" , Linux Netdev List , Roland Dreier , Hal Rosenstock , linux-rdma List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > Any news of this patch ? > > We need it for 2.6.32 and also to prepare 2.6.33 with upcoming patches. Sorry for not explicitly emailing about this patch. I applied it as part of Sean's series, but I just added it to my 2.6.33 queue. At this point in the release cycle it doesn't look severe enough for 2.6.32, unless I miss something. - R. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html