From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: [ofa-general][PATCH 3/4] SRP fail-over faster Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:52:00 -0700 Message-ID: References: <4AD3B453.3030109@mellanox.com> <4AD63681.6080901@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4AD63681.6080901-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> (Vu Pham's message of "Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:37:21 -0700") Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Vu Pham Cc: Linux RDMA list List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > First it does not make sense for user to set it below 60; therefore, > it is forced to have 60 and above Why not? A minute seems to be a really long time given the point of these patches is supposed to be failing over faster. Surely we can tell if a path really failed sooner than 60 seconds on an IB fabric. - R. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html