From: Roland Dreier <rdreier-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Steve Wise <swise-10udUCx4aRo@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-rdma <linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: rdma provider module references
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 09:09:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adapqt3gdzb.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D08E989.5020307-10udUCx4aRo@public.gmane.org> (Steve Wise's message of "Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:15:05 -0600")
> I notice that if I have a user rdma application running that has an
> rdma connection using iw_cxgb3, then the iw_cxgb3 module reference
> count is bumped and thus it cannot be unloaded. However when I have
> an NFSRDMA connection that utilizes iw_cxgb3, the module reference
> count is not bumped, and iw_cxgb3 can erroneously be unloaded while
> the NFSRDMA connection is still active, causing a crash.
What is supposed to happen is that as the HW driver is unloading, it
calls ib_unregister_device() first, and this calls each client's
.remove() method to have it release everything related to that device.
However I guess NFS/RDMA is behind the RDMA CM, which is supposed to
handle device removal. In that code it seems to end up in
cma_process_remove(), which appears at first glance to do the right
things to destroy all connections etc.
The idea is that RDMA devices should be like net devices, ie you can
remove them even if they're in use -- things should just clean up,
rather than blocking the module removal. The uverbs case is a bit of a
hack because we don't have a way to handle revoking the mmap regions
etc yet.
What goes wrong with NFS/RDMA in this scheme? It looks like it should work.
- R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-15 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-15 16:15 rdma provider module references Steve Wise
[not found] ` <4D08E989.5020307-10udUCx4aRo@public.gmane.org>
2010-12-15 17:09 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
[not found] ` <adapqt3gdzb.fsf-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2010-12-15 18:53 ` Steve Wise
2010-12-16 15:34 ` Steve Wise
2010-12-16 15:48 ` Steve Wise
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adapqt3gdzb.fsf@cisco.com \
--to=rdreier-fyb4gu1cfyuavxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=swise-10udUCx4aRo@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox