From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] IB Netlink Interface and RDMA CM exports Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:39:21 -0800 Message-ID: References: <4CE00A72.30001@voltaire.com> <20101115031904.GA3566@obsidianresearch.com> <1289836238.2258.1088.camel@nirm-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1289836238.2258.1088.camel@nirm-desktop> (Nir Muchtar's message of "Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:50:38 +0200") Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Nir Muchtar Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , rolandd-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, monis-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, ogerlitz-hKgKHo2Ms0FWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > Well, the main reason for the module separation is to allow > extensibility and independence. I don't understand how the physical location of object code has anything to do with extensibility and independence? ie what is the relevance of what .ko file the netlink support code sits in? - R. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html