From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: [PATCH] libibverbs: add path record definitions to sa.h Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 15:33:24 -0700 Message-ID: References: <2420730B531C4665BD842A7F46007DA2@amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2420730B531C4665BD842A7F46007DA2-Zpru7NauK7drdx17CPfAsdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> (Sean Hefty's message of "Thu, 6 May 2010 15:22:58 -0700") Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Sean Hefty Cc: linux-rdma List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > +#define IB_PATH_RECORD_REVERSIBLE 0x80 > + > +struct ib_path_record Can we use IBV_ / ibv_ prefixes here to match the rest of libibverbs? Also having struct ibv_sa_path_rec and struct ibv_path_record is sort of unfortunate. Not sure if I can think of a better name here though -- ibv_raw_path_record? ibv_packed_path_record? Oh well... -- Roland Dreier || For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html