public inbox for linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Suresh Shelvapille
	<suri-lFb5ksp6isWhEniVeURVKkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: How to know if SRQ is being used in SRP?
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:08:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adavd7p3pbe.fsf@roland-alpha.cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8BAAFD34FEF6492A8E3B43698E454B3D-+IkoAhRkys/CbFgIbBqbbjGjJy/sRE9J@public.gmane.org> (Suresh Shelvapille's message of "Thu, 5 Aug 2010 12:38:55 -0400")

  > I have the envious task of figuring out whether SRQ is being used in
  > an SRP application (which I have very little knowledge about). I
  > only have IB transport layer traces from the customer.  From the
  > traces I can see Valid Credits in the Syndrome field of the AETH in
  > RDMA_ReadResponse_First/last messages.  Although there are a bunch
  > of RC SENDs where the AETH syndrome field is Invalid, unfortunately
  > I cannot seem to correlate these RC SENDS with the RDMA
  > read/responses.  My questions is, since the RDMA response AETH field
  > has valid CC credits is it saying SRQ is not being used?

As I guess you know, if end-to-end credits are used on an RC connection,
then SRQ cannot be used on that connection.  The opposite implication
does not hold: eg a TCA might not implement the optional end-to-end flow
control protocol, and hence a non-SRQ connection might still not use
end-to-end flow control.

Also end-to-end flow control is negotiated for each direction of a
connection independently, so you might see valid end-to-end credits sent
in only one direction.

Essentially the only thing you can learn from a wire-level trace is the
following: if you see an AETH with valid end-to-end credits being sent
from CA X, then the corresponding receive queue on CA X is not attached
to an SRQ.  I don't believe there is anything further you can deduce.
(Certainly invalid end-to-end credits do not imply that an SRQ is being
used, they simply imply that the end-to-end flow control protocol is not
in use)

 - R.
-- 
Roland Dreier <rolandd-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> || For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-08-05 18:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-03 14:02 [PATCH v2] IB/srp: use multiple CPU cores more effectively Bart Van Assche
     [not found] ` <201008031602.37294.bvanassche-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2010-08-04 19:45   ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
     [not found]     ` <4C59C34F.2000400-d+Crzxg7Rs0@public.gmane.org>
2010-08-04 20:40       ` Roland Dreier
     [not found]         ` <adak4o66rir.fsf-BjVyx320WGW9gfZ95n9DRSW4+XlvGpQz@public.gmane.org>
2010-08-05 10:55           ` Bart Van Assche
     [not found]             ` <AANLkTikswdOfqoZOmSqmug4ue3KLv3V8NH9W1ME4tnfQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-08-05 16:38               ` How to know if SRQ is being used in SRP? Suresh Shelvapille
     [not found]                 ` <8BAAFD34FEF6492A8E3B43698E454B3D-+IkoAhRkys/CbFgIbBqbbjGjJy/sRE9J@public.gmane.org>
2010-08-05 17:42                   ` Ralph Campbell
     [not found]                     ` <1281030129.7414.16.camel-/vjeY7uYZjrPXfVEPVhPGq6RkeBMCJyt@public.gmane.org>
2010-08-05 18:05                       ` Suresh Shelvapille
     [not found]                         ` <D8F95421ED674F1DAC3A9A471854A748-+IkoAhRkys/CbFgIbBqbbjGjJy/sRE9J@public.gmane.org>
2010-08-05 18:16                           ` Roland Dreier
2010-08-05 18:08                   ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2010-08-05 16:58               ` [PATCH v2] IB/srp: use multiple CPU cores more effectively Roland Dreier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=adavd7p3pbe.fsf@roland-alpha.cisco.com \
    --to=rdreier-fyb4gu1cfyuavxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=suri-lFb5ksp6isWhEniVeURVKkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox