From: Roland Dreier <rdreier-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Ralph Campbell <ralph.campbell-h88ZbnxC6KDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-rdma <linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/ipoib: fix dangling pointer references to ipoib_neigh and ipoib_path
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:15:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aday6ihvzqg.fsf@roland-alpha.cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1267126142.30294.25.camel-/vjeY7uYZjrPXfVEPVhPGq6RkeBMCJyt@public.gmane.org> (Ralph Campbell's message of "Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:29:02 -0800")
> When using connected mode, ipoib_cm_create_tx() kmallocs a
> struct ipoib_cm_tx which contains pointers to ipoib_neigh and
> ipoib_path. If the paths are flushed or the struct neighbour is
> destroyed, the pointers held by struct ipoib_cm_tx can reference
> freed memory. The fix is to add reference counts to struct
> ipoib_neigh and ipoib_path and to add locking when getting
> new references.
Good debugging.
First look at this patch is that it ends up being rather invasive. I
wonder if we could fix this in the other direction by keeping a list of
the ipoib_cm_tx structures affected in the neigh and path structures,
and clean the cm_tx stuff up when flushing?
Also I don't see any issues from a first read, but can you confirm that
you're not adding more locking/atomic ops (via kref) to the main data path?
- R.
--
Roland Dreier <rolandd-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-25 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-25 19:29 [PATCH] IB/ipoib: fix dangling pointer references to ipoib_neigh and ipoib_path Ralph Campbell
[not found] ` <1267126142.30294.25.camel-/vjeY7uYZjrPXfVEPVhPGq6RkeBMCJyt@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-25 20:03 ` Arthur Kepner
[not found] ` <20100225200357.GW29938-sJ/iWh9BUns@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-25 23:43 ` Ralph Campbell
2010-02-25 20:15 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
[not found] ` <aday6ihvzqg.fsf-BjVyx320WGW9gfZ95n9DRSW4+XlvGpQz@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-26 0:41 ` Ralph Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aday6ihvzqg.fsf@roland-alpha.cisco.com \
--to=rdreier-fyb4gu1cfyuavxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ralph.campbell-h88ZbnxC6KDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox