From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: [ewg] [PATCHv8 03/11] IB/umad: Enable support only for IB ports Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 15:11:09 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20100218172354.GD12286@mtls03> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100218172354.GD12286@mtls03> (Eli Cohen's message of "Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:23:54 +0200") Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Eli Cohen Cc: Linux RDMA list , ewg List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Why do we not allow umad for IBoE ports? I understand there's no QP0 but why can't userspace use QP1 just like for IB link layer ports? -- Roland Dreier || For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html