From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC8CA143864; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 20:32:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717792371; cv=none; b=P1lmhmltIUCRjSMl0kFq9GNhIkwVSzUIhkRNRCIAqe7UGzRl5We4FS+6aGGkB7q5IEk9djtgXF1Q1Iz/x1D2Cmvx0MexlGH2ogpoXZZQ1ChT0Y5daCNtjQTuzOJ+vBzDZZ0Xc3uXsVncdAwyrMc1jy8snbPTJjnMZtgdDmCt2hE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717792371; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cQS3SD3BPxuj8SuRnqpzvh5wVyukzx93gck4SNGGdYE=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pji5xthcKDyxRWfIXQkRZpvTUl26p6hyHRHYCWLyC5UIrPLbEQX9BSuVYp53a0oFOnAzFE8m13w/d7/fomF43CSpvwqBZc1EVy46VVVLbuC7rV3ae6tBcygB9JnJPPzDYEAOhPc+mS0mjC9vCdbraTU0QoP/egPrAH+zuLld0yQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=JczuZEET; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="JczuZEET" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12F0FC2BBFC; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 20:32:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1717792371; bh=cQS3SD3BPxuj8SuRnqpzvh5wVyukzx93gck4SNGGdYE=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JczuZEETSt8ZKgu0sh6D9aTbTcq+mqMZlw8pQFQOHG+T5xSafn6vY9Lc7owldFs0x sEbsmYEAz2182B8LwxmUtWbAm6vj2z2nE8yILXdGmlyVAHV8clBgMvooXTY27NTad4 We8vD99+OB0JTgivP9CO1fb95Lj23ZVuZk0nxWIkZGGAtt1t5Vze/QU0NXKsMhbg3g 50C3hwxCyuM7FflN8XMcpQvlk3q2uQRsclZJOZphzUEGHBRW+DAubWWvswmuoMQpQ/ 7gpONk1qu5NsSwDtydhxvmrSbZBTjEC0WI10ggc9FMkBGjzC+Luo2s7ywhSbDeNXu5 Bmh94AkOMSvlA== Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 13:32:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Mat Martineau To: "D. Wythe" cc: Matthieu Baerts , kgraul@linux.ibm.com, wenjia@linux.ibm.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com, wintera@linux.ibm.com, guwen@linux.alibaba.com, kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com, Paolo Abeni , edumazet@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 3/3] net/smc: Introduce IPPROTO_SMC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1717592180-66181-1-git-send-email-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> <1717592180-66181-4-git-send-email-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> <6e0f1c4a-4911-51c3-02fa-a449f2434ef1@kernel.org> <61b94bf6-a383-afff-db62-261cac7360c7@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-2041299453-1717792371=:89802" This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-2041299453-1717792371=:89802 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Sat, 8 Jun 2024, D. Wythe wrote: > Hi Mat and Matthieu, > > Thanks very much for your feedback!  The reasons you all have provided are > already quite convincing. > In fact, as I mentioned earlier, I actually don't have sufficient grounds to > insist on 263.  It seems it's time for a change. 😉 > Ok, sounds like a good plan. > Regarding the new value of IPPROTO_SMC, do you have any recommendations? > Which one might be better, 256 or 261? Not sure there's a clear winner. If you use 256 that could be a hint for the next developer to use 257 for a future IPPROTO, so I slightly prefer 256. - Mat --0-2041299453-1717792371=:89802--