From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E4B314B088; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 08:37:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732869434; cv=none; b=IVvz5pjX6K1pB3UEQodLN8+fUSYnTzj/RrHvKbPCFw8Zgda2q9kqVdy6Y4x2bR2/Y8+0TU0aQBbFFGCstxujSUQ1rVqOh7kE3Yk49n/EsQjrlD6Vvtot7+FY86wY68fXOUu3MfIwtIGhd/qUJ27Wh0eFugD2tRlJKb3QktwdqC0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732869434; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9tMAvfJO5jKNtlFjYMD67jnJ5EHNyRI5/IF38xGyMGs=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=aGbJmIYSPt19S7PIWpXGILPXdsGUKMbaxlCogtEooA/aYo9rszoVy2mgH96QepW2S7Aoim5rE1Womg/LmdMXVU2k0FIOf0wIhxYWMroGOOupSlzvLbYykrhQVB9yBBVwNw0YqckXhZgx0G66ITbww3stb21T6XlTPikm7OU8gMc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.235]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Y063n3Q6Sz4f3k5f; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 16:36:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.128]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438771A0568; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 16:37:07 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.176.73] (unknown [10.174.176.73]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgCXc4cxfUlnCQufDA--.43500S3; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 16:37:07 +0800 (CST) Subject: Re: blktests failures with v6.12 kernel To: Shinichiro Kawasaki , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "nbd@other.debian.org" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "yukuai (C)" References: <6crydkodszx5vq4ieox3jjpwkxtu7mhbohypy24awlo5w7f4k6@to3dcng24rd4> From: Yu Kuai Message-ID: Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 16:37:05 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6crydkodszx5vq4ieox3jjpwkxtu7mhbohypy24awlo5w7f4k6@to3dcng24rd4> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gbk; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID:gCh0CgCXc4cxfUlnCQufDA--.43500S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoW7Wr1fGw1fuFyfCFy5Jr47urg_yoWDJrXEvw 17CF93G3yxAry0vFn7KFn29rW7KFZ09w17try8Xrna9as5tFykJFsIvrZI9ryDCw1rZr9I v3y5WF48ua1a9jkaLaAFLSUrUUUUjb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUb4AYFVCjjxCrM7AC8VAFwI0_Gr0_Xr1l1xkIjI8I6I8E6xAIw20E Y4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwV A0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW5JVW7JwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x02 67AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I 0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40E x7xfMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x 0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IY64vIr41lc7I2V7IY0VAS07AlzVAYIcxG8wCY1x0262kKe7AK xVWUAVWUtwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F4 0E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_JF0_Jw1l IxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxV AFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6r1j6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j 6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_GrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU1veHD UUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: 51xn3trlr6x35dzhxuhorxvhhfrp/ Hi, ÔÚ 2024/11/26 10:19, Shinichiro Kawasaki дµÀ: > #5: throtl/001 (CKI project, s390 arch) > > Recently, CKI project added a configuration to run the blktests thortl group, > and failures have been repeatedly observed for s390 architecture [7]. I > suspect the failure message below implies that system performance may affect > the test result. Further debug is needed. > > throtl/001 (basic functionality) [failed] > runtime ... 6.309s > --- tests/throtl/001.out 2024-11-23 20:53:13.446546653 +0000 > +++ /mnt/tests/s3.amazonaws.com/arr-cki-prod-lookaside/lookaside/kernel-tests-public/kernel-tests-production.zip/storage/blktests/throtl/blktests/results/nodev/throtl/001.out.bad 2024-11-23 20:53:21.332699696 +0000 > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > Running throtl/001 > +2 > 1 > -1 > -1 > +2 > 1 Perhaps can we have a quick try, and check if issuing IO to a null_blk in this platform, the latency can't be ignored in seconds. Thanks, Kuai