public inbox for linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>
To: "Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	"Håkon Bugge" <haakon.bugge@oracle.com>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
	Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/cma: Make CM response timeout and # CM retries configurable
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 11:14:44 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <afadc799-b547-5c20-64d2-75fa0f64cd9e@opengridcomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190222163637.GA9819@ziepe.ca>


On 2/22/2019 10:36 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 06:09:09PM +0100, Håkon Bugge wrote:
>> During certain workloads, the default CM response timeout is too
>> short, leading to excessive retries. Hence, make it configurable
>> through sysctl. While at it, also make number of CM retries
>> configurable.
>>
>> The defaults are not changed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Håkon Bugge <haakon.bugge@oracle.com>
>>  drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
>> index c43512752b8a..ce99e1cd1029 100644
>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
>> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/inetdevice.h>
>>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>>  #include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/sysctl.h>
>>  #include <net/route.h>
>>  
>>  #include <net/net_namespace.h>
>> @@ -68,13 +69,46 @@ MODULE_AUTHOR("Sean Hefty");
>>  MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Generic RDMA CM Agent");
>>  MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
>>  
>> -#define CMA_CM_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT 20
>>  #define CMA_QUERY_CLASSPORT_INFO_TIMEOUT 3000
>> -#define CMA_MAX_CM_RETRIES 15
>>  #define CMA_CM_MRA_SETTING (IB_CM_MRA_FLAG_DELAY | 24)
>>  #define CMA_IBOE_PACKET_LIFETIME 18
>>  #define CMA_PREFERRED_ROCE_GID_TYPE IB_GID_TYPE_ROCE_UDP_ENCAP
>>  
>> +#define CMA_DFLT_CM_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT 20
>> +static int cma_cm_response_timeout = CMA_DFLT_CM_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT;
>> +static int cma_cm_response_timeout_min = 8;
>> +static int cma_cm_response_timeout_max = 31;
>> +#undef CMA_DFLT_CM_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT
>> +
>> +#define CMA_DFLT_MAX_CM_RETRIES 15
>> +static int cma_max_cm_retries = CMA_DFLT_MAX_CM_RETRIES;
>> +static int cma_max_cm_retries_min = 1;
>> +static int cma_max_cm_retries_max = 100;
>> +#undef CMA_DFLT_MAX_CM_RETRIES
>> +
>> +static struct ctl_table_header *cma_ctl_table_hdr;
>> +static struct ctl_table cma_ctl_table[] = {
>> +	{
>> +		.procname	= "cma_cm_response_timeout",
>> +		.data		= &cma_cm_response_timeout,
>> +		.maxlen		= sizeof(cma_cm_response_timeout),
>> +		.mode		= 0644,
>> +		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec_minmax,
>> +		.extra1		= &cma_cm_response_timeout_min,
>> +		.extra2		= &cma_cm_response_timeout_max,
>> +	},
>> +	{
>> +		.procname	= "cma_max_cm_retries",
>> +		.data		= &cma_max_cm_retries,
>> +		.maxlen		= sizeof(cma_max_cm_retries),
>> +		.mode		= 0644,
>> +		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec_minmax,
>> +		.extra1		= &cma_max_cm_retries_min,
>> +		.extra2		= &cma_max_cm_retries_max,
>> +	},
>> +	{ }
>> +};
> Is sysctl the right approach here? Should it be rdma tool instead?
>
> Jason

There are other rdma sysctls currently:  net.rdma_ucm.max_backlog and
net.iw_cm.default_backlog.  The core network stack seems to use sysctl
and not ip tool to set basically globals.

To use rdma tool, we'd have to have some concept of a "module" object, I
guess.  IE there's dev, link, and resource rdma tool objects currently. 
But these cma timeout settings are really not per dev, link, nor a
resource.   Maybe we have just a "core" object:  rdma core set
cma_max_cm_retries min 8 max 30.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-22 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-17 17:09 [PATCH] RDMA/cma: Make CM response timeout and # CM retries configurable Håkon Bugge
2019-02-22 16:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-22 17:14   ` Steve Wise [this message]
2019-02-22 17:51     ` Doug Ledford
2019-02-23  8:49       ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-02-25 17:23         ` Håkon Bugge
2019-03-04  6:27         ` Parav Pandit
2019-04-12 19:30           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-04-12 19:56             ` Leon Romanovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=afadc799-b547-5c20-64d2-75fa0f64cd9e@opengridcomputing.com \
    --to=swise@opengridcomputing.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=haakon.bugge@oracle.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=parav@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox