From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2F203DB326; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784193199; cv=none; b=SWuQVJVxriObaBYwA+47W/zlAll4obMROS4HkzafSSk7hOlv18gAClcndE8OoK4UPGoZHC/pvxeGMhLD0/bNUgO0tUVOI0TX6AhOCnyd9iVf5FBUMbq6v2Ffv58XdMuypd8bkwT9G9ByaD4m+0VChDhcNdHQTA2+SeJ5oNmHy6Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784193199; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iTgmRt/mOhfeVVtmxm9TcACq90Tyo5vsbd/jxsIv5Z8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=D1mtrZyRSgmnKxCM06XEcyIdHpEEAIkg53bLBhq3oY6RQncz27vT2iWQsr/B4HvNA27Ys78k6j6I+vX5XN4gEDRqpTXPFpduK5rDwprDLJjEQVOz1UtO3HOMH6rhd62kGCHljV59ot4qMiHcwWqCFV31SDdEvt0luMpKR/cIxtc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ay9RStfR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ay9RStfR" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F28231F000E9; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:13:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1784193194; bh=iTgmRt/mOhfeVVtmxm9TcACq90Tyo5vsbd/jxsIv5Z8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=ay9RStfRqzjIAkK9qMkR2z+5qf0qqqVKp9e3TmHYXeStbB17RWYaMTy3uBEQg9KdB u6SzyAyck8jHQYnZRcDZF2nv4JSlVK4s+Z9AU6vm4Z8hdBsYN/pLtEuoZ1uePJ0ei+ CgwmpsarAdZLu5fqmEDEh1cyx1Hkj2MzKeUhBMvb3bdhVqCABV+8VgCEe6FDEOjjO5 qL6/bzX0PVJJW9W9nJfTJrTOKM+osmvCPL9h6+QY3ZBSJrc6TfQFtxhuA1XgcYUKNj nNSh+4LtoZwZxaqnJtf/7k1p7/OJu8+sERq6XAOZ6syFQj2Cdz8ihwQ2xEfBx+fsWk BBTOOeQ6E91Fw== Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 10:12:56 +0100 From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" Cc: Andrew Morton , Stanislav Kinsburskii , airlied@gmail.com, akhilesh@ee.iitb.ac.in, corbet@lwn.net, dakr@kernel.org, jgg@ziepe.ca, kees@kernel.org, leon@kernel.org, liam@infradead.org, lizhi.hou@amd.com, lyude@redhat.com, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mamin506@gmail.com, mhocko@suse.com, mripard@kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, ogabbay@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, rppt@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, simona@ffwll.ch, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, surenb@google.com, tzimmermann@suse.de, vbabka@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] mm/hmm: Clarify notifier retry state and scope HMM timeouts Message-ID: References: <178406760622.1106335.2379450382728057793.stgit@skinsburskii> <4300f09b-8f93-4605-b072-7c09a82cb16e@kernel.org> <20260715101432.99957d2d33203fafe4af2e1c@linux-foundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 10:59:56AM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote: > On 7/15/26 19:14, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2026 09:39:37 -0700 Stanislav Kinsburskii wrote: > > > >>> > >>> Please don't do this, this is completely impossible to track for review :) > >>> > >>> mm review is currently very difficult based on volumes, it'll become impossible > >>> to manage if people sound fragments of series. > >>> > >>> Please just resend the whole thing at this point. > >>> > >> > >> Well, I followed the guidance provided by Andrew, and I believe he > >> applied all of the changes, including these, to the `mm` tree. > >> > >> Do you still want me to send v9 under these circumstances? > > > > Sure, if that's what reviewers prefer. > > > > This is a bit unfriendly to people who have already reviewed the code. > > Which is one of the reasons why I respond to a new version with a > > single diff showing reviewers (and the author, and myself) what changed > > since the previous version. > > As much as I dislike fixup patches, I tolerate them in reply to the existing series. > > But having some random fixup series is just crazy, really. > > -- > Cheers, > > David Yes. Stanislav - also see Jason's suggestion - if you give a base commit then sashiko seems to work better. Maybe look at using b4 which does all of this for you automatically? Thanks, Lorenzo