From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] RDMA/core: iWARP Port Mapper Overview Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 13:10:32 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: References: <20140326220718.GA8784@TENIKOLO-MOBL1> <20140609165105.GB1816@obsidianresearch.com> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140609165105.GB1816-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Or Gerlitz , Tatyana Nikolova , Steve Wise , Roland Dreier , "Lacombe, John S" , Sean Hefty , linux-rdma List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > The message from netdev has, IMHO, always been pretty clear - offload > can live in it's own little side world but cannot appear to the user > to be integrated to the main stack (because it isn't). Hmmm... The flow steering API already does what the port mapper does and its already merged. Why do we need another implementation? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html