From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julia Lawall Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/26] constify local structures Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 21:11:35 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <1473599168-30561-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> <1473616576.19464.10.camel@perches.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1473616576.19464.10.camel@perches.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org Sender: "devel" To: Joe Perches Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Mustafa Ismail , Tatyana Nikolova , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Jason Gunthorpe , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-can@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall , Shiraz Saleem , Sergei Shtylyov , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Chien Tin Tung , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 11 Sep 2016, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sun, 2016-09-11 at 15:05 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > Constify local structures. > > Thanks Julia. > > A few suggestions & questions: > > Perhaps the script should go into scripts/coccinelle/ > so that future cases could be caught by the robot > and commit message referenced by the patch instances. OK. > Can you please compile the files modified using the > appropriate defconfig/allyesconfig and show the I currently send patches for this issue only for files that compile using the x86 allyesconfig. > movement from data to const by using > $ size .new/old > and include that in the changelogs (maybe next time)? OK, thanks for the suggestion. > Is it possible for a rule to trace the instances where > an address of a struct or struct member is taken by > locally defined and declared function call where the > callee does not modify any dereferenced object? > > ie: > > struct foo { > int bar; > char *baz; > }; > > struct foo qux[] = { > { 1, "description 1" }, > { 2, "dewcription 2" }, > [ n, "etc" ]..., > }; > > void message(struct foo *msg) > { > printk("%d %s\n", msg->bar, msg->baz); > } > > where some code uses > > message(qux[index]); > > So could a coccinelle script change: > > struct foo qux[] = { to const struct foo quz[] = { > > and > > void message(struct foo *msg) to void message(const struct foo *msg) Yes, this could be possible too. Thanks for the feedback. julia