From: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Surabhi Gogte <sgogte@purestorage.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] nvmet-rdma: use a separate lockdep class for the listening cm_id
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 11:13:51 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avUgRda_hV069fNl@shinmob> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111153712.GA2532299@ziepe.ca>
On Nov 11, 2026 / 11:37, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2026 at 02:01:58PM +0900, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
> > index 337a49d1acf7..334f39c2f5e5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
> > @@ -3949,6 +3949,12 @@ int rdma_listen(struct rdma_cm_id *id, int backlog)
> > container_of(id, struct rdma_id_private, id);
> > int ret;
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> > + static struct lock_class_key cma_listen_handler_mutex_key;
> > + lockdep_set_class(&id_priv->handler_mutex,
> > + &cma_listen_handler_mutex_key);
> > +#endif
> > +
>
> This seems OK, I think we already have examples of this in CM IIRC?
Yes, I think so. siw and rxe drivers use dynamic lockdep classes for their
sockets:
$ git checkout v7.4-rc2
HEAD is now at 7475ea8b5861 Linux 7.4-rc2
$ cd drivers/infiniband/
$ git grep lock_class_key
sw/rxe/rxe_net.c:static struct lock_class_key rxe_recv_sk_key[2];
sw/rxe/rxe_net.c:static struct lock_class_key rxe_recv_slock_key[2];
sw/rxe/rxe_qp.c:static struct lock_class_key rxe_send_sk_key[2];
sw/rxe/rxe_qp.c:static struct lock_class_key rxe_send_slock_key[2];
sw/siw/siw_cm.c:static struct lock_class_key siw_sk_key[2];
sw/siw/siw_cm.c:static struct lock_class_key siw_slock_key[2];
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 2:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-08 12:01 [PATCH RFC 0/2] RDMA/cma, nvmet-rdma: fix a lockdep WARN Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
2026-11-08 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] RDMA/cma: Add rdma_reclassify_id_for_listen() Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
2026-11-08 12:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-08 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] nvmet-rdma: use a separate lockdep class for the listening cm_id Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
2026-11-08 12:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 0:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-11-11 5:01 ` Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
2026-11-11 15:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-11-12 2:13 ` Shin'ichiro Kawasaki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avUgRda_hV069fNl@shinmob \
--to=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=sgogte@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox