Re: [PATCH] RDMA/restrack: Fix potential invalid address access

[Wenchao Hao <haowenchao2@huawei.com>]

On 2024/3/4 15:35, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 11:21:19AM +0800, Wenchao Hao wrote:
>> On 2024/3/3 20:57, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 05:55:15PM +0800, Wenchao Hao wrote:
>>>> struct rdma_restrack_entry's kern_name was set to KBUILD_MODNAME
>>>> in ib_create_cq(), while if the module exited but forgot del this
>>>> rdma_restrack_entry, it would cause a invalid address access in
>>>> rdma_restrack_clean() when print the owner of this rdma_restrack_entry.
>>>
>>> How is it possible to exit owner module without cleaning the resources?
>>>
>>
>> I meet this issue with one of our product who develop their owner kernel
>> modules based on ib_core, and there are terrible logic with the exit
>> code which cause resource leak.
>>
>> Of curse it's bug of module who did not clear resource when exit, but
>> I think ib_core should avoid accessing memory of other modules directly
>> to provides better stability.
>>
>> What's more, from the context of rdma_restrack_clean() when print
>> "restack: %s %s object allocated by %s is not freed ...", it seems
>> designed for the above scene where client has bug to alerts there
>> are resource leak, so we should not panic on this log print.
> 
> Can you please share the kernel panic?
> 

Sorry, there is no stack or panic info recorded. This is because
another issue of "printk". It seems printk would cause a deadlock
when printk access invalid address with our kernel.

Actually, I found this issue with ftrace/kprobe but not printk, that's
why it takes me a long time to address it.

BTW, I am not developer of rdma, after found the issue, I think it's
better to enhance, so send this patch, and the patch has been tested with
the origin scene.

> Thanks