From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: blktest failures
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2022 14:47:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ca5cf784-702b-ebf8-2736-cf1e89a09ae5@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8ff53db7-137f-8d29-18e7-3926de255deb@gmail.com>
On 4/9/22 14:43, Bob Pearson wrote:
> On 4/9/22 00:04, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 04:25:12PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> One of the functions in the above call stack is sd_remove(). sd_remove()
>>> calls del_gendisk() just before calling sd_shutdown(). sd_shutdown()
>>> submits the SYNCHRONIZE CACHE command. In del_gendisk() I found the
>>> following comment: "Fail any new I/O". Do you agree that failing new I/O
>>> before sd_shutdown() is called is wrong? Is there any other way to fix this
>>> than moving the blk_queue_start_drain() etc. calls out of del_gendisk() and
>>> into a new function?
>>
>> That SYNCHRONIZE CACHE is a passthrough command sent on the request_queue
>> and should not be affected by stopping all file system I/O.
>
> When I run check -q srp
> all the test cases pass but each one stops for 3+ minutes at synchronize cache.
> The rxe device is still active until sync cache returns when the last QP and the PD
> are destroyed. It may be that the queues are blocked waiting for something else
> even though they have reported success??
Hi Bob,
After having taken a closer look at del_gendisk(), I agree with what
Christoph wrote above. Please revert patch "scsi: scsi_debug: Address
races following module load" locally when running blktests. See also
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/5fb68dbd-ae0e-6230-8f9f-dd6df5593584@interlog.com/T/#m47a23ffd5ce68b8183100444d6e711b6b4aba393.
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-09 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-08 22:10 blktest failures Bob Pearson
2022-04-08 22:50 ` Bob Pearson
2022-04-08 23:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-04-09 0:31 ` Yi Zhang
2022-04-09 4:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-04-09 5:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-09 21:43 ` Bob Pearson
2022-04-09 21:47 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2022-04-15 7:12 ` Yanjun Zhu
2022-04-15 7:26 ` Bob Pearson
2022-04-15 7:29 ` Bob Pearson
2022-04-15 7:37 ` Yanjun Zhu
2022-04-15 7:46 ` Bob Pearson
2022-04-15 7:59 ` Yanjun Zhu
2022-04-15 15:44 ` Bob Pearson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ca5cf784-702b-ebf8-2736-cf1e89a09ae5@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=rpearsonhpe@gmail.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).