Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] SELinux support for Infiniband RDMA

[Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1745 bytes --]

On 5/19/2017 3:35 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Daniel Jurgens <danielj-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> On 5/19/2017 7:49 AM, Dan Jurgens wrote:
>>> From: Daniel Jurgens <danielj-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
>>>
>>> Note on v7, it applies cleanly on Paul Moores' tree.  'git am' fails to
>>> apply patch 0002* to Dougs' tree, but 'patch' applies it without rejects.
>>> There's a new file that needs to be added before resolving the git am,
>>> drivers/infiniband/core/security.c
>>
>> There's actually a trivial merge conflict in drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs.c that doesn't cause patch to create a reject file, in the function create_qp a my patch adds a "goto err_destroy;".  In Dougs' tree it needs to be changed to "goto err_cb".
> 
> Thanks for the rebase Daniel.  Aside from the small problems with LSM
> hook init code that I already mentioned it looks good to me.
> 
> Considering that we got an ACK from the IB folks on v6 of your
> patchset I went ahead and merged it into the selinux/next tree.  I do
> reserve the right to yank it out before the next merge window if we
> discover any problems with the userspace, policy, or tests, but I
> think those are moving along nicely at the moment.
> 
> Doug, and other IB folks, can I get an explicit ACK on this rebased
> patchset from Daniel?  I don't like sending cross-subsystem changes
> this large upstream without the associated ACKs.
> 

Acked-by: Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

-- 
Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
    GPG Key ID: B826A3330E572FDD
    Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B  1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 884 bytes --]