From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A408722259A for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2025 09:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750670211; cv=none; b=aSn41r1t2iCoVKA08n28g9/dzWfhEdch7ue/641iM/m/3C0j8sksUl3USnUOVZMGXABuhpXfkTPWPtJhDYbmplGzMbxaRb/IIM88wgH60NwppNq/LA3UCfQ0reoHM/aoyoE2f0Z0jlFti3704rNivayFCaJ+YSWvdIJ/jeL6kpc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750670211; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WXi6ciQl/ySvtGGnf6utBqod7v8My4gfOiJugdbgvWQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=VVsIwKLlOoP/PT/8KPmeJFDqSTD/D7Tb7xVc9jkTcCVVRHsLgk9KKrF61bcoSqHbsaI9iInfXhbCDT30A3gIMhnShNtQVN5/jjeTZUvo0bvLcKE8Puiq0FvvX0/V4nreFOlIj0KRyjiVQcdYnLn5T+05NwAKoy5GDlkUdAKnyPs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=Hf3Nkj6B; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Hf3Nkj6B" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1750670208; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=6+CEh7DV/eygJzLS3mmbXc5krbfV2IS8Kf/dZNnKGmA=; b=Hf3Nkj6BlGJi5C19A772jcpvXQ2JnGKtmvcU1RsPh84/k8r/KWPLIX62n0p0IeWBs9Iu8U 1tD8KI2XlHFpYG4PKECvZV5Yzl19Wt/NSub3usR7jS9mqyAGqv3irlcag5uFvzrcQzE9cZ IHef3bAvEFhcsdzwcqrBgo58KfYMDZc= Received: from mail-wm1-f72.google.com (mail-wm1-f72.google.com [209.85.128.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-599-4ZNMhej6McytTeei1YL3Dg-1; Mon, 23 Jun 2025 05:16:47 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 4ZNMhej6McytTeei1YL3Dg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 4ZNMhej6McytTeei1YL3Dg_1750670206 Received: by mail-wm1-f72.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-451d3f03b74so20948155e9.3 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2025 02:16:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1750670206; x=1751275006; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:autocrypt :content-language:from:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6+CEh7DV/eygJzLS3mmbXc5krbfV2IS8Kf/dZNnKGmA=; b=WIAcohI4lYAE0yICWqeASccRv9EP68Dq7c8Fn6UCQWrSetrf4HMqqxt96A6AnU2VsF DnSnv2un085W0y1K43hKSIxeWa6hAVvBtD3n98C3zavBNjAiDzMcPYRGezWWMnTeYGFF U5qCQIP8k9U00tyxMtTeRm4btgtyIhNeFueBPBG4Tt25VsTSJQzmyfwSJ7Ow3QWQPiWC TIKgHN99dRH+G2SPN3uq2iCsiyCFOnBaK8RyY7pBNaEpkOAed/FQGiNt2aSwAnqRtFZt fI4YIwz8QKX4AVyZsLavcqNsJJThIsGqILXm5TrylhsCTVI3XAO4wKjuaa4E/pK+dA0S VNcQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUd39Xua5vBCUv2p+ENgHBB6wrGzdcA+U9lD9RMDUaxiq4mnxtVu03B1oqmBJmS+qSSsXy7rF30C/GE@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxkrbkCyW0UI+TDBJ0jXiVIPzNuRVr497H2piGcsqv8C3DZ7G33 UWM+U97OdfjuHrt2xPuWHyl2aSzbm3ch1NDJAjBKkbGGDOTzAO8dlvbnL27sw7uBRXKWXKwYU/4 4JILSGVgmBo0YkAyS5Ow4U2yDHRFP0sSqKa6KaTwz+xCfGalKM81+y8GMCG3eneg= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsinj/DipT4phOM7n0v2y7eGdOGVUUjD1n496Uzbf7qorHY9W5lIZ6k336nIMc fzNxi884Oe9UBJ1Ji3mEog4PR7OEQIeWn/r1O5KacWhomfX/tbNw6r+/8qOt51267PkQQoLlaAZ 7xEVIrBksAdCjg3sKUnRzOvcMIfm0bjJ8+ybfo09B96/cZ5oFk0yVdbbJoKo34fILlnPgAyEutl qMr3rOvNbDazhqWm3Qosi/FgwS+MBM3VMX6uitVlI9ezOHp4z80GWRSS6dgeHEZjO//Dzvt8KEk oWJxkML12B17tEXKiUDub8BFZ2ALlk0XlKHsIhuHEcTqDEB4j97+DJn3h8+QdwLT4mX7vgZOFtB S66kIpSsaOQYGbO7RJ9JdhKS/PU83aDsk22yi270rGVOKlxMNIg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:c4ac:b0:442:dc75:5625 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-453659be428mr99470665e9.5.1750670205678; Mon, 23 Jun 2025 02:16:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGSdTrkum0uGk/zLo1y8F4EbYhm1nsGHbNNP/oVrjmhH2urGZHFTnIjPrsPub1P941JC31blw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:c4ac:b0:442:dc75:5625 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-453659be428mr99469955e9.5.1750670205140; Mon, 23 Jun 2025 02:16:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:d8:2f4e:fd00:8e13:e3b5:90c8:1159? (p200300d82f4efd008e13e3b590c81159.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:d8:2f4e:fd00:8e13:e3b5:90c8:1159]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-453646fd816sm104134785e9.24.2025.06.23.02.16.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Jun 2025 02:16:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 11:16:43 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 9/9] page_pool: access ->pp_magic through struct netmem_desc in page_pool_page_is_pp() To: Byungchul Park , willy@infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel_team@skhynix.com, kuba@kernel.org, almasrymina@google.com, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, harry.yoo@oracle.com, hawk@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, davem@davemloft.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, asml.silence@gmail.com, toke@redhat.com, tariqt@nvidia.com, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, saeedm@nvidia.com, leon@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, horms@kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, vishal.moola@gmail.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, ziy@nvidia.com, jackmanb@google.com References: <20250620041224.46646-1-byungchul@sk.com> <20250620041224.46646-10-byungchul@sk.com> From: David Hildenbrand Content-Language: en-US Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; keydata= xsFNBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABzSREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT7CwZgEEwEIAEICGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQW AgMBAh4BAheAAhkBFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl8Ox4kFCRKpKXgACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1oHcA//a6Tj7SBNjFNM1iNhWUo1lxAja0lpSodSnB2g4FCZ4R61SBR4l/psBL73xktp rDHrx4aSpwkRP6Epu6mLvhlfjmkRG4OynJ5HG1gfv7RJJfnUdUM1z5kdS8JBrOhMJS2c/gPf wv1TGRq2XdMPnfY2o0CxRqpcLkx4vBODvJGl2mQyJF/gPepdDfcT8/PY9BJ7FL6Hrq1gnAo4 3Iv9qV0JiT2wmZciNyYQhmA1V6dyTRiQ4YAc31zOo2IM+xisPzeSHgw3ONY/XhYvfZ9r7W1l pNQdc2G+o4Di9NPFHQQhDw3YTRR1opJaTlRDzxYxzU6ZnUUBghxt9cwUWTpfCktkMZiPSDGd KgQBjnweV2jw9UOTxjb4LXqDjmSNkjDdQUOU69jGMUXgihvo4zhYcMX8F5gWdRtMR7DzW/YE BgVcyxNkMIXoY1aYj6npHYiNQesQlqjU6azjbH70/SXKM5tNRplgW8TNprMDuntdvV9wNkFs 9TyM02V5aWxFfI42+aivc4KEw69SE9KXwC7FSf5wXzuTot97N9Phj/Z3+jx443jo2NR34XgF 89cct7wJMjOF7bBefo0fPPZQuIma0Zym71cP61OP/i11ahNye6HGKfxGCOcs5wW9kRQEk8P9 M/k2wt3mt/fCQnuP/mWutNPt95w9wSsUyATLmtNrwccz63XOwU0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYCGwwWIQQb2cqtc1xMOkYN/MpN3hD3 AP+DWgUCXw7HsgUJEqkpoQAKCRBN3hD3AP+DWrrpD/4qS3dyVRxDcDHIlmguXjC1Q5tZTwNB boaBTPHSy/Nksu0eY7x6HfQJ3xajVH32Ms6t1trDQmPx2iP5+7iDsb7OKAb5eOS8h+BEBDeq 3ecsQDv0fFJOA9ag5O3LLNk+3x3q7e0uo06XMaY7UHS341ozXUUI7wC7iKfoUTv03iO9El5f XpNMx/YrIMduZ2+nd9Di7o5+KIwlb2mAB9sTNHdMrXesX8eBL6T9b+MZJk+mZuPxKNVfEQMQ a5SxUEADIPQTPNvBewdeI80yeOCrN+Zzwy/Mrx9EPeu59Y5vSJOx/z6OUImD/GhX7Xvkt3kq Er5KTrJz3++B6SH9pum9PuoE/k+nntJkNMmQpR4MCBaV/J9gIOPGodDKnjdng+mXliF3Ptu6 3oxc2RCyGzTlxyMwuc2U5Q7KtUNTdDe8T0uE+9b8BLMVQDDfJjqY0VVqSUwImzTDLX9S4g/8 kC4HRcclk8hpyhY2jKGluZO0awwTIMgVEzmTyBphDg/Gx7dZU1Xf8HFuE+UZ5UDHDTnwgv7E th6RC9+WrhDNspZ9fJjKWRbveQgUFCpe1sa77LAw+XFrKmBHXp9ZVIe90RMe2tRL06BGiRZr jPrnvUsUUsjRoRNJjKKA/REq+sAnhkNPPZ/NNMjaZ5b8Tovi8C0tmxiCHaQYqj7G2rgnT0kt WNyWQQ== Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: <20250620041224.46646-10-byungchul@sk.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 20.06.25 06:12, Byungchul Park wrote: > To simplify struct page, the effort to separate its own descriptor from > struct page is required and the work for page pool is on going. > > To achieve that, all the code should avoid directly accessing page pool > members of struct page. > > Access ->pp_magic through struct netmem_desc instead of directly > accessing it through struct page in page_pool_page_is_pp(). Plus, move > page_pool_page_is_pp() from mm.h to netmem.h to use struct netmem_desc > without header dependency issue. > > Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park > Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen > Reviewed-by: Mina Almasry > Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov > Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka > Acked-by: Harry Yoo > --- > include/linux/mm.h | 12 ------------ > include/net/netmem.h | 14 ++++++++++++++ > mm/page_alloc.c | 1 + > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h > index 0ef2ba0c667a..0b7f7f998085 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mm.h > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h > @@ -4172,16 +4172,4 @@ int arch_lock_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long status); > */ > #define PP_MAGIC_MASK ~(PP_DMA_INDEX_MASK | 0x3UL) > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_POOL > -static inline bool page_pool_page_is_pp(struct page *page) > -{ > - return (page->pp_magic & PP_MAGIC_MASK) == PP_SIGNATURE; > -} > -#else > -static inline bool page_pool_page_is_pp(struct page *page) > -{ > - return false; > -} > -#endif > - > #endif /* _LINUX_MM_H */ > diff --git a/include/net/netmem.h b/include/net/netmem.h > index d49ed49d250b..3d1b1dfc9ba5 100644 > --- a/include/net/netmem.h > +++ b/include/net/netmem.h > @@ -56,6 +56,20 @@ NETMEM_DESC_ASSERT_OFFSET(pp_ref_count, pp_ref_count); > */ > static_assert(sizeof(struct netmem_desc) <= offsetof(struct page, _refcount)); > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_POOL > +static inline bool page_pool_page_is_pp(struct page *page) > +{ > + struct netmem_desc *desc = (struct netmem_desc *)page; > + > + return (desc->pp_magic & PP_MAGIC_MASK) == PP_SIGNATURE; > +} > +#else > +static inline bool page_pool_page_is_pp(struct page *page) > +{ > + return false; > +} > +#endif I wonder how helpful this cleanup is long-term. page_pool_page_is_pp() is only called from mm/page_alloc.c, right? There, we want to make sure that no pagepool page is ever returned to the buddy. How reasonable is this sanity check to have long-term? Wouldn't we be able to check that on some higher-level freeing path? The reason I am commenting is that once we decouple "struct page" from "struct netmem_desc", we'd have to lookup here the corresponding "struct netmem_desc". ... but at that point here (when we free the actual pages), the "struct netmem_desc" would likely already have been freed separately (remember: it will be dynamically allocated). With that in mind: 1) Is there a higher level "struct netmem_desc" freeing path where we could check that instead, so we don't have to cast from pages to netmem_desc at all. 2) How valuable are these sanity checks deep in the buddy? -- Cheers, David / dhildenb