From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.189]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 817F8107; Mon, 4 Dec 2023 18:05:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from kwepemi500006.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.53]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4SkkJy355lz14L41; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:00:50 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.120.168] (10.67.120.168) by kwepemi500006.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.68) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:05:47 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:05:46 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH for-rc 0/6] Bugfixes and improvements for hns RoCE Content-Language: en-US To: Leon Romanovsky CC: , , , References: <20231129094434.134528-1-huangjunxian6@hisilicon.com> <20231204142447.GB5136@unreal> From: Junxian Huang In-Reply-To: <20231204142447.GB5136@unreal> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To kwepemi500006.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.68) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected On 2023/12/4 22:24, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 05:44:28PM +0800, Junxian Huang wrote: >> Here are several bugfixes and improvements for hns RoCE. >> >> Chengchang Tang (4): >> RDMA/hns: Rename the interrupts >> RDMA/hns: Remove unnecessary checks for NULL in mtr_alloc_bufs() >> RDMA/hns: Fix memory leak in free_mr_init() >> RDMA/hns: Improve the readability of free mr uninit > > 1. The series doesn't apply. > ➜ kernel git:(wip/leon-for-next) ~/src/b4/b4.sh shazam -l -s https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231129094434.134528-1-huangjunxian6@hisilicon.com -P 1-5 Is this series going to be applied to -next? > 2. Please drop patch #6 as you are deleting the code which you added in > first patches without actual gain. Is it better to drop it directly or merge it with the previous patch? Thanks, Junxian > > Thanks > >> >> Junxian Huang (2): >> RDMA/hns: Response dmac to userspace >> RDMA/hns: Add a max length of gid table >> >> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_ah.c | 7 ++ >> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c | 87 +++++++++++++++------- >> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_mr.c | 2 +- >> include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h | 5 ++ >> 4 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 2.30.0 >> >> >