From: Sreedhar Kodali <srkodali-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
pradeeps-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org,
linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] rsockets: distribute completion queue vectors among multiple cores
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 17:58:26 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <edc2b05703209d2a7626a31abb170ceb@imap.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <540DF3CC.1060304-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
On 2014-09-08 23:52, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 09/08/14 16:27, Sreedhar Kodali wrote:
>> Thanks for your insights. Your suggestion of having a separate
>> vector per process is really useful when multiple processes are
>> simultaneously running in the same environment. At the implementation
>> level this requires an extended configuration file format. Can't
>> we possibly think of this as a next iteration?
>
> This patch introduces a new configuration file
> (/etc/rdma/rsocket/comp_vector). User expect that such configuration
> files remain supported after a software upgrade. In other words,
> introduction of a new configuration file deserves careful
> consideration. Do we really need this new configuration file ? Why not
> e.g. to change the default behavior of the rsockets library into
> spreading the interrupt processing workload over all completion
> vectors supported by the HCA ? Furthermore, the number of completion
> vectors that is supported by an HCA not only depends on the HCA
> firmware but also on the number of completion vectors a HCA could
> allocate during driver initialization. The number of MSI-X vectors
> available on an x86-64 system is limited (224). Dual-socket x86-64
> motherboards with up to 11 PCIe slots are available commercially. If
> all PCIe-slots are populated it's almost sure that one of the PCIe
> cards won't be assigned as many MSI-X vectors as it could use.
>
> Sorry but I'm not convinced that using the same completion vector mask
> for all HCA's and all processes is a good idea. Or is there perhaps
> something I have overlooked ?
>
> Bart.
Hi Bart,
I agree with your suggestions - working on the revised patch
accordingly.
Thank You.
- Sreedhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-09 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-05 13:18 [PATCH v2 3/4] rsockets: distribute completion queue vectors among multiple cores Sreedhar Kodali
[not found] ` <f028f54b9900ee34fcd1abd1d90d10e6-FJGp5E75HVmZamtmwQBW5tBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-05 15:47 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <5409DB0D.6080103-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-06 3:06 ` Sreedhar Kodali
[not found] ` <850a2835b5917f6da62af3d1ea0288fd-FJGp5E75HVmZamtmwQBW5tBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-08 6:47 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <540D50E9.5050709-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-08 14:27 ` Sreedhar Kodali
[not found] ` <a8ac21f3c9d7c802ab089bc0d432e40b-FJGp5E75HVmZamtmwQBW5tBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-08 18:22 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <540DF3CC.1060304-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-09 12:28 ` Sreedhar Kodali [this message]
[not found] ` <edc2b05703209d2a7626a31abb170ceb-FJGp5E75HVmZamtmwQBW5tBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-11 12:34 ` Sreedhar Kodali
[not found] ` <ef556922e7b766360a38df904dff1c70-FJGp5E75HVmZamtmwQBW5tBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-15 9:06 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <5416ABFB.7040701-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-16 4:33 ` Sreedhar Kodali
[not found] ` <d5804c38cb47bcc79eb3962cf8ca6989-FJGp5E75HVmZamtmwQBW5tBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-16 4:57 ` Hefty, Sean
[not found] ` <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A8237399DD3DA8-P5GAC/sN6hkd3b2yrw5b5LfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-17 5:54 ` Sreedhar Kodali
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=edc2b05703209d2a7626a31abb170ceb@imap.linux.ibm.com \
--to=srkodali-23vcf4htsmix0ybbhkvfkdbpr1lh4cv8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bvanassche-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pradeeps-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox