From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E683C63777 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 08:36:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1D424671 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 08:36:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726211AbgKQIgC convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:36:02 -0500 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]:2435 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725355AbgKQIgC (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:36:02 -0500 Received: from DGGEMM401-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CZzmG4vtVz53vc; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:35:42 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggema703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.67) by DGGEMM401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.209) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:35:56 +0800 Received: from dggema753-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.195) by dggema703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.67) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1913.5; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:35:55 +0800 Received: from dggema753-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.9.48.84]) by dggema753-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.9.48.84]) with mapi id 15.01.1913.007; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:35:55 +0800 From: liweihang To: Leon Romanovsky CC: "dledford@redhat.com" , "jgg@ziepe.ca" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , Linuxarm Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 for-next 1/2] RDMA/hns: Add support for CQ stash Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2 for-next 1/2] RDMA/hns: Add support for CQ stash Thread-Index: AQHWvBAlKbwt9UNgt0KPBLCpit0Bsw== Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 08:35:55 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1605527919-48769-1-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com> <1605527919-48769-2-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com> <20201116134645.GL47002@unreal> <2692da9a4b814dfa952659a903eb96f0@huawei.com> <20201117072034.GO47002@unreal> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.67.100.165] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 2020/11/17 15:21, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 06:37:58AM +0000, liweihang wrote: >> On 2020/11/16 21:47, Leon Romanovsky wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 07:58:38PM +0800, Weihang Li wrote: >>>> From: Lang Cheng >>>> >>>> Stash is a mechanism that uses the core information carried by the ARM AXI >>>> bus to access the L3 cache. It can be used to improve the performance by >>>> increasing the hit ratio of L3 cache. CQs need to enable stash by default. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Lang Cheng >>>> Signed-off-by: Weihang Li >>>> --- >>>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_common.h | 12 +++++++++ >>>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h | 1 + >>>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c | 3 +++ >>>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.h | 39 +++++++++++++++++------------ >>>> 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_common.h b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_common.h >>>> index f5669ff..8d96c4e 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_common.h >>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_common.h >>>> @@ -53,6 +53,18 @@ >>>> #define roce_set_bit(origin, shift, val) \ >>>> roce_set_field((origin), (1ul << (shift)), (shift), (val)) >>>> >>>> +#define FIELD_LOC(field_h, field_l) field_h, field_l >>>> + >>>> +#define _hr_reg_set(arr, field_h, field_l) \ >>>> + do { \ >>>> + BUILD_BUG_ON(((field_h) / 32) != ((field_l) / 32)); \ >>>> + BUILD_BUG_ON((field_h) / 32 >= ARRAY_SIZE(arr)); \ >>>> + (arr)[(field_h) / 32] |= \ >>>> + cpu_to_le32(GENMASK((field_h) % 32, (field_l) % 32)); \ >>>> + } while (0) >>>> + >>>> +#define hr_reg_set(arr, field) _hr_reg_set(arr, field) >>> >>> I afraid that it is too much. >> >> Hi Leon, >> >> Thanks for the comments. >> >>> 1. FIELD_LOC() macro to hide two fields. >> >> Jason has suggested us to simplify the function of setting/getting bit/field in >> hns driver like IBA_SET and IBA_GET. >> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/patch/1589982799-28728-3-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com/ >> >> So we try to make it easier and clearer to define a bitfield for developers. > > Jason asked to use genmask and FIELD_PREP, but you invented something else. > > Thanks > We use them in another interface 'hr_reg_write(arr, field, val)' which hasn't been used in this series. Does it make any unacceptable mistake? We would appreciate any suggestions :) Thanks Weihang