From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Allison Henderson" <achender@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 2/2] net/rds: include the scope id in the sendmsg connection cache check
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2026 03:23:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-163529@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261008031426.1142344-3-achender@kernel.org>
> rds_sendmsg() reuses the connection cached in rs->rs_conn when its
> peer address and ToS match the request. The interface index is part
> of a connection's identity as well: rds_conn_create_outgoing() passes
> the request's scope_id down as dev_if, and rds_conn_lookup() compares
> c_dev_if, so sends to the same link-local address through two
> interfaces are two different connections. The cache-hit test never
> looked at it.
>
> A socket bound to a non-link-local address has rs_bound_scope_id 0,
> and the scope check at the top of rds_sendmsg() accepts any non-zero
> destination scope for such a socket. So after a send to fe80::x%ifA,
> a send to fe80::x%ifB hits the cached ifA connection and the datagram
> leaves through ifA, to whichever peer answers to that address there.
>
> Compare c_dev_if with the request's scope_id in the cache test, so
> that such a send takes the lookup path and finds, or creates, the ifB
> connection - the same key the lookup uses. With the previous patch a
> send without a destination carries the connected peer's scope, or the
> bound scope for a non-link-local peer, which is what an explicit send
> to that peer computes, so the comparison is exact for it too.
>
> Found by inspection while reworking this cache for the connection
> lifetime series on net-next; not observed in the field.
>
> Fixes: 1e2b44e78eea ("rds: Enable RDS IPv6 support")
> Assisted-by: Claude-Code:claude-fable-5
> Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson <achender@kernel.org>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261008031426.1142344-1-achender@kernel.org?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-08 3:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-08 3:14 [PATCH net v4 0/2] net/rds: scope-aware sendmsg connection cache Allison Henderson
2026-10-08 3:14 ` [PATCH net v4 1/2] net/rds: keep the connected peer's scope id apart from the bound one Allison Henderson
2026-10-08 3:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 11:57 ` Simon Horman
2026-10-08 3:14 ` [PATCH net v4 2/2] net/rds: include the scope id in the sendmsg connection cache check Allison Henderson
2026-10-08 3:23 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-09 11:57 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-163529@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=achender@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox