From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DAD73812DB for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 20:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792183309; cv=none; b=j7B/zZO4u7dZIUdEiG9nTvBxSBilwZoVXof7RJs3eRFjeKZDv4NsuAKrkpJK2TnKhMuA5yBn2po/YexL7QLVB485qUuIIGknJlaoB2c6cPKoPcYo5usqLsOuRgwIMdGsZfOYD3X18qtLLFSXMDlndWCTbn2PC4K0EYNhzjCGlL4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792183309; c=relaxed/simple; bh=O0Up4GuO/x1sN+lXfPV1Kw2JZ6vMLHlj5yDm2f5jW+E=; h=Message-ID:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type: Date; b=BQzAEBMagt7qEUU4Rd6Icy/par+DzsR4s4Ct82z4+ckRUiFgXfq/KHUMBgH7ZpSUjEzChcW3OT7WGB80TjHHxKlRAMh59N+7/ByuYbCsJ3s/+wrUoEVfVGEagA1qpoMaGJYwOisF6XQ+6PEDJp5T8QQnaGyjAY3294363C816Ag= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=UOYmvVJm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UOYmvVJm" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF68C1F000C4; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 20:41:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792183308; bh=O0Up4GuO/x1sN+lXfPV1Kw2JZ6vMLHlj5yDm2f5jW+E=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=UOYmvVJmve9X00Lo/edAgXx8jdviVyknFSAu9RzJz1Kuyjs4SDicbG0N2B5/MaC0Y bNAIvsm6jgqet7c7qfhpQ3dqo3OnFf/RDkLIZJXjjwUdcgmPylZ6UAm0VLaHDSYNm8 sZylhzulmGF9fZVYRv+DOLvsz6uYHYlhDMLVnzzgDtTGeU1vwQNWJQno+/T1mzCAre i3WnX0QFbb6fmSziQIcrOgw1YbNZeOfPav0pJhkVB9fTpNClUtMiMKglffT2m6pJq+ 4OKHkeSKxjZuhzDhp7a/5CNoidJQEIqhb5lfXU2iOJOUWIp2CbitO7cNwNnzhYfOcL hRkV9DWpuAt2Q== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v3 6/6] RDMA/irdma: Support UMEM attribute for SRQ creation Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "David Hu" Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261016202909.1289496-7-dhu@x6u.co> References: <20261016202909.1289496-1-dhu@x6u.co> <20261016202909.1289496-7-dhu@x6u.co> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 20:41:47 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: David Hu >=20 > Support the standard 1-step queue buffer creation for SRQ by > `UVERBS_ATTR_CREATE_SRQ_BUF_UMEM` via `ib_umem_get_attr()`. >=20 > Set up hardware pble directly from the pinned SRQ umem via > `irdma_setup_q_pbl_from_umem()`. >=20 > Proper umem and pble cleanup, and error unwind are added into existing > `irdma_srq_free_rsrc()` upon SRQ destruction. >=20 > We maintain backward compatibility for the legacy 2-step registration if > the UMEM attribute is not provided. >=20 > Signed-off-by: David Hu Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261016202909.1289= 496-1-dhu@x6u.co?part=3D6