From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "David Hu" <dhu@x6u.co>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v3 5/6] RDMA/irdma: Support UMEM attribute for CQ creation
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 20:56:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-174933@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261016202909.1289496-6-dhu@x6u.co>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] RDMA/irdma: integer overflow in irdma_setup_umode_cq() CQ page calculation
- [High] RDMA/irdma: unaligned CQ and shadow UMEMs bypass 4K page offset check
--
commit 79df0143a3db151761db4b97121b37dcf76bacb9
Author: David Hu <xuehaohu@google.com>
RDMA/irdma: Support UMEM attribute for CQ creation
This commit adds support for one-step CQ creation using
UVERBS_ATTR_CREATE_CQ_BUF_UMEM and IRDMA_IB_ATTR_CREATE_CQ_SHADOW_BUF_UMEM
to pin user buffers and set up hardware PBL entries directly from UMEM. It
also updates irdma_cq_free_rsrc() and irdma_resize_cq() to release UMEM and
PBLE resources when the user ring reference count reaches zero.
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/verbs.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/verbs.c
> index 4b7e9c2d9cff5..02ed7ab99e48d 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/verbs.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/verbs.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2746,14 +2768,18 @@ static int irdma_setup_umode_cq(struct irdma_device *iwdev,
> struct irdma_cq_init_info *info,
> struct uverbs_attr_bundle *attrs)
> {
> + struct irdma_cq_uk_init_info *ukinfo = &info->cq_uk_init_info;
> struct ib_udata *udata = &attrs->driver_udata;
> struct irdma_create_cq_req req = {};
> struct irdma_pci_f *rf = iwdev->rf;
> + struct irdma_sc_dev *dev = &rf->sc_dev;
> struct irdma_ucontext *ucontext;
> struct irdma_cq_mr *cqmr_shadow;
> struct irdma_cq_mr *cqmr;
> unsigned long flags;
> + bool cqe_64byte_ena;
> int err_code;
> + u8 cqe_size;
>
> iwcq->user_mode = true;
> ucontext = rdma_udata_to_drv_context(udata, struct irdma_ucontext,
> @@ -2767,26 +2793,87 @@ static int irdma_setup_umode_cq(struct irdma_device *iwdev,
> if (err_code)
> return err_code;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&ucontext->cq_reg_mem_list_lock, flags);
> - iwcq->iwpbl = irdma_get_pbl((unsigned long)req.user_cq_buf,
> - &ucontext->cq_reg_mem_list);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ucontext->cq_reg_mem_list_lock, flags);
> - if (!iwcq->iwpbl)
> - return -EPROTO;
> + cqe_64byte_ena = dev->hw_attrs.uk_attrs.feature_flags & IRDMA_FEATURE_64_BYTE_CQE ?
> + true : false;
> + cqe_size = cqe_64byte_ena ? 64 : 32;
> +
> + if (uverbs_attr_is_valid(attrs, UVERBS_ATTR_CREATE_CQ_BUF_UMEM)) {
> + struct ib_umem *umem;
> + struct irdma_mem_reg_req cq_req = {};
> + u8 shadow_pgcnt = (rf->sc_dev.hw_attrs.uk_attrs.feature_flags &
> + IRDMA_FEATURE_CQ_RESIZE) ? 0 : IRDMA_SHADOW_PGCNT;
> + u32 min_size;
> +
> + cq_req.cq_pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(ukinfo->cq_size * cqe_size,
> + IRDMA_HW_PAGE_SIZE);
> + min_size = (cq_req.cq_pages + shadow_pgcnt) << IRDMA_HW_PAGE_SHIFT;
[Severity: Critical]
Can ukinfo->cq_size * cqe_size overflow 32-bit arithmetic or truncate when
assigned to the __u16 cq_req.cq_pages field here?
Unlike irdma_create_cq() and irdma_resize_cq(), irdma_create_user_cq() and
irdma_alloc_cq() do not check attr->cqe > rf->max_cqe before setting
ukinfo->cq_size:
drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/verbs.c:irdma_create_user_cq() {
err_code = cq_validate_flags(attr->flags, dev->hw_attrs.uk_attrs.hw_rev);
if (err_code)
return err_code;
if (udata->outlen < IRDMA_CREATE_CQ_MIN_RESP_LEN)
return -EINVAL;
err_code = irdma_alloc_cq(iwdev, iwcq, attr, &info);
}
Because ukinfo->cq_size is u32, cqe_size is u8 (32 or 64), and
cq_req.cq_pages in struct irdma_mem_reg_req is __u16, a large user-supplied
UVERBS_ATTR_CREATE_CQ_CQE value (such as 0x00400040 or 0x04000040 when
cqe_size is 64) causes cq_req.cq_pages to wrap or truncate to 1.
When that happens, min_size becomes 4096 bytes, ib_umem_get_cq_buf() pins a
single 4KB page, and irdma_setup_q_pbl_from_umem() accepts the 1-page UMEM
in PBLE_LEVEL_0 physical mode while __irdma_create_cq() ->
irdma_sc_cq_create() programs the unvalidated cq->cq_uk.cq_size into the
hardware CQP WQE. Could this allow hardware DMA writes beyond the single
pinned page?
> +
> + umem = ib_umem_get_cq_buf(&iwdev->ibdev, attrs, min_size,
> + IB_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE);
> + if (IS_ERR(umem))
> + return PTR_ERR(umem);
> +
> + iwcq->iwpbl = irdma_setup_q_pbl_from_umem(iwdev, umem, NULL,
> + IRDMA_MEMREG_TYPE_CQ, &cq_req);
> + if (IS_ERR(iwcq->iwpbl)) {
> + err_code = PTR_ERR(iwcq->iwpbl);
> + iwcq->iwpbl = NULL;
> + ib_umem_release(umem);
> + return err_code;
> + }
> + } else {
> + if (!req.user_cq_buf)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ucontext->cq_reg_mem_list_lock, flags);
> + iwcq->iwpbl = irdma_get_pbl((unsigned long)req.user_cq_buf,
> + &ucontext->cq_reg_mem_list);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ucontext->cq_reg_mem_list_lock, flags);
> + if (!iwcq->iwpbl)
> + return -EPROTO;
> + }
>
> cqmr = &iwcq->iwpbl->cq_mr;
>
> if (rf->sc_dev.hw_attrs.uk_attrs.feature_flags &
> IRDMA_FEATURE_CQ_RESIZE) {
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&ucontext->cq_reg_mem_list_lock, flags);
> - iwcq->iwpbl_shadow =
> - irdma_get_pbl((unsigned long)req.user_shadow_area,
> - &ucontext->cq_reg_mem_list);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ucontext->cq_reg_mem_list_lock, flags);
> + if (uverbs_attr_is_valid(attrs, IRDMA_IB_ATTR_CREATE_CQ_SHADOW_BUF_UMEM)) {
> + struct ib_umem *shadow_umem;
> + struct irdma_mem_reg_req shadow_req = {
> + .cq_pages = IRDMA_SHADOW_PGCNT,
> + };
> +
> + shadow_umem =
> + ib_umem_get_attr(&iwdev->ibdev, attrs,
> + IRDMA_IB_ATTR_CREATE_CQ_SHADOW_BUF_UMEM,
> + IRDMA_SHADOW_AREA_SIZE << 3,
> + IB_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE);
> + if (IS_ERR(shadow_umem))
> + return PTR_ERR(shadow_umem);
> +
> + iwcq->iwpbl_shadow =
> + irdma_setup_q_pbl_from_umem(iwdev, shadow_umem, NULL,
> + IRDMA_MEMREG_TYPE_CQ,
> + &shadow_req);
[Severity: High]
What happens on RoCE if userspace passes a non-4KB-aligned buffer in
UVERBS_ATTR_CREATE_CQ_BUF_UMEM or IRDMA_IB_ATTR_CREATE_CQ_SHADOW_BUF_UMEM?
In irdma_setup_q_pbl_from_umem(), the page-offset check is skipped on RoCE,
and region->address is passed as virt to irdma_alloc_iwmr():
drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/verbs.c:irdma_setup_q_pbl_from_umem() {
/* iWarp: Catch page not starting on OS page boundary */
if (!rdma_protocol_roce(&iwdev->ibdev, 1) && ib_umem_offset(region))
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
iwmr = irdma_alloc_iwmr(region, &iwdev->ibdev, pd, region->address, reg_type);
}
Inside irdma_alloc_iwmr(), ib_umem_find_best_pgsz(region, SZ_4K, virt)
compares the virtual address alignment against the physical page offset, so
the intra-page offset cancels out and returns SZ_4K even when
region->address is not 4KB-aligned.
Later, irdma_handle_q_mem() -> irdma_setup_pbles() ->
irdma_copy_user_pgaddrs() populates the PBL using
rdma_block_iter_dma_address(&biter), which masks off the low 12 bits
(~(iwmr->page_size - 1)). Doesn't this set info->cq_base_pa (or the PBLE
entries) and info->shadow_area_pa to offset 0 of the 4KB page rather than
the user buffer's offset within the page, causing the hardware to DMA to or
from the wrong offset in that page?
[ ... ]
> cqmr_shadow = &iwcq->iwpbl_shadow->cq_mr;
> info->shadow_area_pa = cqmr_shadow->cq_pbl.addr;
> } else {
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261016202909.1289496-1-dhu@x6u.co?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-16 20:29 [PATCH rdma-next v3 0/6] RDMA/irdma: Add support for ioctl David Hu
2026-10-16 20:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v3 1/6] RDMA/irdma: Plumb uverbs_attr_bundle for QP, SRQ David Hu
2026-10-16 20:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 20:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v3 2/6] RDMA/irdma: Register irdma UVERBS ioctl namespace David Hu
2026-10-16 20:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 20:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v3 3/6] RDMA/irdma: Support UMEM attribute for QP creation David Hu
2026-10-16 20:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 20:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v3 4/6] RDMA/irdma: Split CQ setup to umode and kmode David Hu
2026-10-16 20:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 20:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v3 5/6] RDMA/irdma: Support UMEM attribute for CQ creation David Hu
2026-10-16 20:56 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-16 20:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v3 6/6] RDMA/irdma: Support UMEM attribute for SRQ creation David Hu
2026-10-16 20:41 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-174933@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dhu@x6u.co \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox