From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Bryam Vargas" <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net/smc: don't spin in smc_rx_recvmsg() while a pipe holds spliced data
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 08:15:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-188952@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261029-b4-disp-da7f8e6a-v2-1-9052904adf72@proton.me>
> From: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
>
> While bytes spliced off the RMB are still in a pipe, recvmsg() waits
> for the pipe to release them before it copies the data behind them.
> The path to that wait skips the timeout and signal checks, and
> smc_rx_wait() returns at once on RCV_SHUTDOWN. With a signal pending,
> after SHUT_RD, or once the peer closes or shuts down writing,
> recvmsg() spins on a CPU until the pipe is drained, and SIGKILL cannot
> stop it. MSG_DONTWAIT and an expired SO_RCVTIMEO wait there too
> instead of returning -EAGAIN.
>
> Check the timeout and signals before that wait, and end it when the
> pipe releases the data or the connection is killed, not on RCV_SHUTDOWN.
> A zero-length read returns 0 without waiting for the pipe; a
> non-blocking one returns -EAGAIN while poll() still reports the socket
> readable (splice() can still take those bytes). The wait sets
> SOCKWQ_ASYNC_WAITDATA like smc_rx_wait(), so a byte arriving behind
> the pipe raises no SIGIO on a reader already asleep for it, and a full
> barrier orders its wait queue entry before its read of splice_pending,
> so no wake is lost.
>
> Fixes: 9014db202cb7 ("smc: add support for splice()")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261029-b4-disp-da7f8e6a-v2-1-9052904adf72@proton.me?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-29 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-29 8:03 [PATCH net v2] net/smc: don't spin in smc_rx_recvmsg() while a pipe holds spliced data Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-10-29 8:06 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-29 8:15 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-188952@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hexlabsecurity@proton.me \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox